European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Outcomes in patients with diabetes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and heart failure treated with tirzepatide or dulaglutide: SURPASS-CVOT analysis

Figure 1 from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Nicholls et al.
Trial in peopleInterventions
Follow

Abstract

AIMS: The impact of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF) outcomes according to HF status is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were treated with tirzepatide up to 15 mg or dulaglutide 1.5 mg weekly (average 4 years). The incidence of MACE-3 [cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke], MACE-4 (CV death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization) and composite of all-cause or CV death and hospitalization or urgent visits for HF were analysed in patients with and without a history of HF. A history of HF (20.3%) was associated with more coronary artery disease and prior MI. Incidences of event categories were higher in the HF group. The hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death or hospitalization or urgent visits for HF on tirzepatide vs. dulaglutide was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.99] in patients with HF and 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1.00) without HF. The HR for CV death or hospitalization or urgent visits for HF was 0.85 (95%CI 0.70-1.03) and 0.96 (95%CI 0.83-1.12), for MACE-3 0.90 (95%CI 0.76-1.08) and 0.93 (95%CI 0.83-1.04), and for MACE-4 0.81 (95%CI 0.69-0.95) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.83-1.00) in patients with and without HF, respectively. The patient-reported outcomes of APPADL and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scores improved and were higher on tirzepatide in both groups. CONCLUSION: With overall non-inferiority established, this exploratory analysis revealed lower rates of the composite of all-cause death or HF events, or MACE-4 among patients with T2D and HF treated with tirzepatide compared with dulaglutide.

From the paper

Result

… respectively [between group difference 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–5.3] in patients with a history of HF, and −5.9 vs. −9.0 mL/min/1.73 m (between group difference 3.1, 95%CI 1.9–4.3) in patients without a history of HF (see Supplementary material online, Figure S6).

Results, Cardiovascular risk factors

Events by group

The composite of death due to any cause or hospitalization or urgent visits for HF occurred in 18.2% of the tirzepatide group and 21.5% …

Results, Heart failure and associated endpoints

Harms

Patients with a history of HF were more likely to experience a serious adverse event (36.4% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.001), but they were less likely to discontinue study drug due to an adverse event (10.4% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.02) compared with those without a history of HF.

Results, Safety and tolerability

Quoted word for word from the full text on academic.oup.com.