Preprints.org

Evaluating Temporal Consistency and Dietary-Recall Sensitivity of the Association Between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and Cardiovascular Disease: Cross-Sectional and Mortality Analyses of NHANES 2005–2018

Preprint: cross-sectional study of 30,579 peoplePopulations
Follow

Abstract

Background: /Objectives: Associations between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) have usually relied on selected cycles, short-term recalls, and prevalent disease. This study examined the association’s consistency across survey periods, its dependence on recall measurement error, and reverse causation. Methods: Adults aged ≥20 years in NHANES 2005–2018 with two 24 h recalls (n = 30,579) were analyzed with survey-weighted logistic regression of self-reported CVD on a 27-parameter DII. Pre-specified analyses were an equivalence test of 2005–2010 versus 2011–2018, regression calibration using the replicate recall, restrictions for post-diagnosis dietary change, and survey-weighted Cox models for mortality through 2019 in 27,239 adults free of CVD. Results: Each 1-unit higher DII was associated with higher odds of CVD (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15). Period-specific ORs were 1.09 and 1.08, but equivalence within ±10% was not established (interaction-model ratio of ORs per SD 0.94, 90% CI 0.85–1.04). After calibration, ORs per unit of usual DII were 1.17 (1.07–1.27) for the two-day mean and 1.20 (1.10–1.31) for day one. Excluding special diets or restricting to diagnoses within 5 or 10 years did not attenuate the association. Hazard ratios were 1.09 (0.98–1.21) for CVD mortality and 1.09 (1.04–1.14) for all-cause mortality. Post hoc, cycle-specific estimates showed no evidence of heterogeneity, and each DII unit was associated with 13% higher serum C-reactive protein. Conclusions: The DII–CVD association was modest, similar across survey periods and recall strategies, and larger after correction for recall error; restriction analyses did not indicate that post-diagnosis dietary change created it, and the CVD mortality estimate was concordant but imprecise. Formal equivalence across periods, a CVD mortality association, and causation were not established.

From the paper

Participants

The primary sample included 30,579 adults, of whom 3,291 reported at least one CVD condition.

Results, 3.1. Participant Characteristics

Result

Each 1-unit higher two-day DII was associated with higher odds of prevalent CVD in the core confounder model (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.15; P = 0.001).

Results, 3.2. Primary Association

Limitation

First, the primary design is cross-sectional, and although the restriction and mortality analyses address reverse causation, they cannot exclude it completely.

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

Quoted word for word from the full text on preprints.org.