Identifying Individualized Multiple Chronic Condition Pathways Associated with Dementia
Abstract
Background: Patients with dementia frequently present with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Growing evidence indicates these conditions do not co-occur by chance but may interact in ways that accelerate cognitive decline. In this study, we presented a machine-learning framework to identify these non-random, personalized MCC patterns associated with dementia, based on patients’ pre-existing conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrated a patient example illustrating how this approach enables the early detection of emerging MCC trajectories. Methods: To address this challenge, we introduced a lazy decision tree (lazyDT-MCCPath) framework using National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center data. For each patient, lazyDT-MCCPath dynamically fine-tunes its training distribution based on pre-existing conditions from the preceding 3-5 years, while remaining MCCs were used to predict dementia risk. The decision tree provides a transparent pathway showing which emerging MCCs were associated with higher dementia risk. Results: Unlike traditional eager decision trees (eagerDT), which lacked sufficient training data for 17%-33% of patient profiles, lazyDT-MCCPath successfully modeled all profiles and achieved a 0.17 improvement in AUROC (0.66 vs. 0.83). Conclusions: lazyDT-MCCPath effectively translates pre-existing MCC profiles into personalized dementia risk probabilities for emerging conditions, which may help clinicians prioritize MCCs to monitor more closely.
From the paper
- Follow-up
These values corresponded to absolute AUROC improvements of 0.151, 0.238, and 0.121, with the largest improvement observed during the 4-year follow-up.
- Limitation
The NACC cohort consists largely of research volunteers evaluated at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers and may not represent patients receiving routine community care.
Quoted word for word from the full text on preprints.org.
The paper
Preprints.org, 10 Oct 2026, Open access, Preprint, not peer-reviewed


