BiomarkersHumansPreprint15,727 participantsCohort study

Model forecasts Alzheimer's progression before diagnosis

In 15,727 participants, a model detected decline before diagnosis in 22.41% of people progressing from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.

medRxiv

In an observational study of 15,727 people who were cognitively normal or had mild cognitive impairment at baseline, researchers evaluated whether computer algorithms could forecast decline without brain scans. They analysed clinical observations and cognitive status collected over up to 10 visits from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Using a machine-learning method called XGBoost, the models predicted progression from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment, and from mild impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Over follow-up averaging 56.1 months, the model detected decline before diagnosis in 29.58% of people who progressed from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment, with an average lead time of 33.04 months. Over follow-up averaging 42.7 months, it identified decline before diagnosis in 22.41% of people progressing from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease, averaging 17.95 months early.

Why it matters

Alzheimer's disease is a major cause of cognitive decline in older adults, but standard clinical assessments often miss early changes. Spotting impending decline months before diagnosis could help healthcare providers stratify risk and test earlier interventions.

Caveats

The study is a preprint that has not yet been peer-reviewed. In addition, the models raised false alarms in 12.6% of cognitively normal non-progressors and 20.0% of mildly impaired non-progressors, and they missed prior detection in the majority of people who declined.

The paper

Forecasting Alzheimer's disease progression using non-imaging clinical features and XGBoost

A. Gautier, L. Zheng, B. G. Schreurs

Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

medRxiv · 7 Oct 2026 · CC BY · Preprint, not peer-reviewed

doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.05.26364229