BMC Primary Care

Assessing the reliability and validity for metabolic syndrome diagnosis using point-of-care analyzers in a mobile setup - a pilot study

Fig. 1. Mobile examination unit (A) equipped with tables, stools, shelves, curtains, laboratory materials and measuring instruments including portable point-of-care-analyzers (B)
Open the figure at full size
Fig. 1. Mobile examination unit (A) equipped with tables, stools, shelves, curtains, laboratory materials and measuring instruments including portable…Mobile examination unit (A) equipped with tables, stools, shelves, curtains, laboratory materials and measuring instruments including portable point-of-care-analyzers (B)Houtenbos et al.
Study of 50 peopleBiomarkers

Non-randomised trial, declared no competing interests

Follow

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by having three or more of these risk factors: increased blood glucose (Glc), serum triglycerides (TG), blood pressure (BP), waist circumference (WC), and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Mobile diagnostics using point-of-care (POC) blood analyzers could help identify individuals at risk. This pilot study assessed reliability and validity of MetS risk factor analysis using POC analyzers in a mobile examination unit. METHODS: Fifty participants (52 ± 7y; 170 ± 10 cm; 80 ± 19 kg, m/f: 21/29) were included for analysis. The mobile examination unit was equipped with different POC analyzers (Alere, LABGEO, CardioChek for Glc, HDL, TG; Quo-Test-A1C Testkit for HbA1c'). Agreement compared to a reference laboratory (RefLab) was analyzed by Bland-Altman (bias, Limits of Agreement (LoA)), ICC, SEM and McNemar's test. Test-retest analysis was assessed on two different days (max. two weeks apart) using Spearman's rho, ICC, test-retest variability (TRV%) and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Based on the smallest bias and low number of missing values (Glc: -5 [LoA - 25 to 6] mg/dl; TG: 8 [LoA - 58 to 30] mg/dl; HDL: -2 [LoA - 14 to 9] mg/dl), and the highest agreement in MetS diagnosis compared to the results of RefLab, the Alere POC device was chosen. Test-retest reliability (n = 16) for MetS risk factors and HbA1c measured in the mobile setup ranged from poor to excellent with low TRV (0.9-5.8%). Risk factor classification and MetS diagnosis did not differ between measurement days. CONCLUSIONS: A mobile setup using the Alere POC analyzer could be used as a valid mobile screening method for MetS to ensure early detection of risk factors.