Grip strength adds no clear value to midlife risk assessment
Adding grip strength changed scores for separating risk groups by minus 0.0046 and 0.0045 versus models including detailed body fat and muscle measurements.
Independent replication
An observational study analysed 508 adults aged 40–59 from the 2011–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, then tested its models in 616 adults aged 40–59 from 2013–2014. They looked for at least two abnormalities: elevated blood pressure, fasting blood sugar or triglycerides, a type of blood fat, or low levels of “good” cholesterol.
The researchers compared models accounting for body size, detailed body fat measurements and muscle mass. They used area-under-the-curve scores to measure how well models distinguished people with and without this combination of abnormalities. Adding grip strength changed these scores by minus 0.0046 in the earlier group and 0.0045 in the later group. Both ranges of likely values included no difference. Detailed body fat measurements improved the scores in both groups.
Why it matters
For middle-aged adults, the work bears on which measurements are useful when assessing heart and metabolic health.
Caveats
This cross-sectional observational analysis assessed existing abnormalities, not future disease risk. The results came from middle-aged adults, and the preprint has not been peer-reviewed.
- Machine learning
- Elevated blood pressure
- Blood pressure
- Triglyceride
- Cardiometabolic abnormalities
- Humans
The paper
Monash University
medRxiv, 12 Oct 2026, CC BY-NC-ND, Preprint, not peer-reviewed
