AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 Abstract

Heart recordings predict future blocks in electrical pathways

One-year prediction scores distinguishing future cases from noncases were 0.910 for left-sided block and 0.859 for right-sided block in a separate database.

Paper by Shaaf Ahmad, Katherine M. Conners, Didong Li, Christy L. Avery, Faisal M Syed · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
A cutaway heart with an interrupted electrical branch is surrounded by smaller hearts showing intact or broken electrical pathways.

Our read

Biomarkers
Studied:
Cohort study of patients, up to 5 years
What changed:
AUROCs for 0-1-year prediction were 0.910 for LBBB and 0.859 for RBBB in external testing

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

Patients’ digital, 10-second heart recordings were analyzed in a machine-learning prediction study of bundle branch block, a delay or blockage in the heart’s electrical pathways. The models used standard 12-lead electrocardiograms, which record the heart’s electrical activity. They excluded recordings with incomplete, ambiguous, current or previous complete block.

The team trained separate models on 1.77 million recordings for left-sided block and 1.72 million for right-sided block. Testing in another database used 81,945 and 81,812 recordings, respectively. The models predicted newly documented complete block up to five years ahead. Adding clinical information and routine recording measurements did not materially improve prediction. Among patients without previous or same-admission heart failure, five-year heart failure incidence was 48.6% in the highest predicted left-sided block risk third versus 5.5% in the lowest.

Why it matters

Heart failure is an age-related disease for which earlier risk assessment may matter. The authors suggest these electrical warning signs could help guide earlier evaluation of heart structure and planning for worsening conduction.

Caveats

Database prediction results do not show whether using the models would improve care. The conference abstract does not give patient ages or the number of unique patients, limiting assessment of whom the results apply to.

Comments

Be the first to comment.