bioRxiv

MMAD-Risk: Multivariate Mixed Survival Analysis for the Prediction of Age-Dependent Disease Risks from Plasma Proteomes

Figure 1. Information about the data included in the analysis.
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Information about the data included in the analysis.Information about the data included in the analysis.Hilger et al., CC BY
Preprint: study of 55,000 peopleBiomarkers
Follow

Abstract

Motivation: Multivariate survival analysis with hundreds of correlated outcomes is computationally challenging. Established approaches either ignore correlations between response variables, rely on black-box deep learning or are limited to small-scale outcomes. Results: We introduce MMAD-Risk, a novel multivariate mixed accelerated failure time (AFT) model that enables scalable analysis of high-dimensional survival analysis data. We train MMAD-Risk using amortized variational inference where we design the variational distribution such that it factorizes across diseases, allowing us to decompose multivariate disease risk prediction into a series of tractable, one-dimensional problems. This allows us to calculate the ELBO analytically, enabling fast computation. The model employs a low-rank decomposition of the effect size matrix B = VW to capture shared disease mechanisms and latent random effects Vz to model comorbidity. MMAD-Risk is trained on the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics cohort (N {approx} 55000, P {approx} 3000 proteins, D = 271 diseases). Using the full 3,000-protein dataset, MMAD-Risk achieved a mean concordance index (c-index) of 0.744 for diagnoses occurring [>=] 10 years after blood sample collection, outperforming a Cox proportional hazards model (mean c-index = 0.709). Greedy backward selection identified a 10-protein panel that preserved > 99% of the full-model performance. On this reduced panel MMAD-Risk still outperformed Cox regression (0.738 vs. 0.679).

The paper

Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences

bioRxiv, 17 Sep 2026, Open access, CC BY, Preprint, not peer-reviewed

doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.752074