Ehealth interventions
Ehealth interventions has been studied in 4 papers since 2023: 1 trial in people, 3 reviews; 2 in the past year. The newest paper, Oct 26, 2026: “Effects of an AI-powered eHealth intervention on physical capacity and self-management in coronary artery disease: the TIMELY multicenter RCT”.
4 papers study it8 findingsUpdated
1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 4 papers on ehealth interventions
At a glance
Independent labs found the same change in people. 3 independent labs in 7 countries.
“Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant between-group differences for primary outcomes including biomarker-based risk assessment.”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 3 independent labs in 7 countries
- 4 of 8 findings with company ties
- Human trial1
Studies in people
1 study gave ehealth interventions to people and measured what changed.
| What changed | Design | People | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
no change: Has no effect on mortality risk up: Improves 6-Minute Walk Testapproximately 7% superior, IG=567.5±90.3 m vs. CG=529.6±111.7 m, p<0.05 up: Improves physical fitnessIG=144.5±39.6 W vs. CG=130.9±44.0 W at 6 mo; IG=141.9±45.2 W vs. CG=130.3±45.2 W at 12 mo; p=0.027 | Randomized trial6 months | 360 peopleBoth60.5±9.2 yearsMidlife adults; Older adults; intention-to-treat analysis | ESC Congress 2026 abstract, Oct 26, 2026 |
What did studies of ehealth interventions find?
7Studies of ehealth interventions measured 7 outcomes; the most studied are physical activity (2 studies), medication adherence (1) and physical fitness (1).
Physical activity
upin humans2
2 studies
Physical activity
upin humans2
Ehealth interventions improve physical activity in humans (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.31).
“eHealth interventions produced a small positive effect on physical activity (standardized mean difference = 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 0.31).”
Review
Digital health
Ehealth interventions increase physical activity in humans (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.41).
“objectively measured moderate to vigorous PA (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.41; P=.002)”
Review
Journal of medical Internet research
Medication adherence
upin humans1
1 study
Medication adherence
upin humans1
Ehealth interventions improve medication adherence in humans (p=0.0071).
“Medication adherence (MARS-5 score) remained significantly higher in the IG at 12 months (interaction, p=0.0071).”
Human trial12 months
ESC Congress 2026 abstract
Physical fitness
upin humans1
1 study
Physical fitness
upin humans1
Ehealth interventions improve physical fitness in humans (IG=144.5±39.6 W vs. CG=130.9±44.0 W at 6 mo; IG=141.9±45.2 W vs. CG=130.3±45.2 W at 12 mo; p=0.027).
“The IG also exhibited greater improvements in physical fitness (time×group interaction, p=0.027), with higher values at 6 months (IG=144.5±39.6 W vs. CG=130.9±44.0 W) and 12 months”
Human trial12 months
ESC Congress 2026 abstract
6-Minute Walk Test
upin humans1
1 study
6-Minute Walk Test
upin humans1
Ehealth interventions improve 6-Minute Walk Test in humans (per-protocol analysis) (approximately 7% superior, IG=567.5±90.3 m vs. CG=529.6±111.7 m, p<0.05).
“per-protocol analysis demonstrated that the IG maintained approximately 7% superior 6MWT performance over 12 months (IG=567.5±90.3 m vs. CG=529.6±111.7 m; p<0.05).”
Human trialper-protocol analysis12 months
ESC Congress 2026 abstract
Mortality risk
no changein humans1
1 study
Mortality risk
no changein humans1
Ehealth interventions showed no clear effect on mortality risk in humans (intention-to-treat analysis).
“Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant between-group differences for primary outcomes including biomarker-based risk assessment.”
Human trialintention-to-treat analysis6 months
ESC Congress 2026 abstract
Fruit intake
upin humans1
1 study
Fruit intake
upin humans1
Ehealth interventions increase fruit intake in humans (SMD 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.32).
“fruit intake (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.32; P=.01)”
Review
Journal of medical Internet research
Smoking cessation
upin humans1OR 2.09
1 study
Smoking cessation
upin humans1OR 2.09
Ehealth interventions increase smoking cessation in humans (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.62-2.70).
“eHealth-based MHBC interventions significantly increased smoking cessation rates (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.62-2.70; P<.001)”
Review
Journal of medical Internet research