Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Biomarker6 papers3 findings
- Human trial2
- Humans4
Interventions
1Smart wheeled walker
no changein humans1Moderate certainty
1 study
Smart wheeled walker
no changein humans1Moderate certainty
Smart wheeled walker has no effect on Falls Efficacy Scale-International in humans (mean difference 1.35, 95% CI -3.81 to 6.51).
Human trialcompared with standard wheeled walkern = 30
A Smart Wheeled Walker With Integrated Physiological Monitoring to Improve Mobility in Older Adults: Randomized Crossover Trial · JMIR aging · 28 Aug 2026
Upstream
1Telephone interview
downin humans1
1 study
Telephone interview
downin humans1
telephone interview decreases Falls Efficacy Scale-International in humans (d = -0.34, p < .001).
Human trialn = 123
Assessing concerns about falling: a comparison of telephone-based and face-to-face FES-I interviews in older adults · BMC geriatrics · 22 Aug 2026
Associations
1Falls
upin humans1OR 1.145
1 study
Falls
upin humans1OR 1.145
Falls Efficacy Scale-International predicts falls in humans (adjusted OR 1.145 (95% CI 1.060-1.237) per 1-point increase).
Human trialchronic kidney disease2 yearsn = 130
The Usefulness of Falls Efficacy Scale-International in Predicting Falls in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients · Journal of clinical medicine · 20 Aug 2026