Income, race, and cardiovascular disease in female breast cancer survivors: evidence of moderated socioeconomic protection in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2019-2022
Declared no competing interests
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of poor outcomes among breast cancer survivors. Treatment contributes to both acute and long-term CVD risk, but social determinants of health (SDoH), like economic deprivation, also compound vulnerability. This study examined the associations between poverty-to-income ratio (PIR) and self-reported CVD in a national sample of breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2019 to 2022, we examined sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and comorbidities in a sample of 2745 female breast cancer survivors. We tested IPTW-adjusted logistic models for associations between PIR and CVD prevalence and interactions by race, age, years of survivorship, and delayed medical care. RESULTS: Higher income did not protect survivors equally. The protection of higher PIR was significantly modified by race/ethnicity (p < 0.0001). Higher PIR reduced the odds of CVD 92% among Black survivors, compared to 68% among White survivors, with no significant association among Asian survivors. The protection of higher PIR was greatest among survivors aged < 65 years and lessened progressively up to ≥ 85 years (p = 0.017). The overall interaction terms were non-significant (p > 0.05) for years of breast cancer survivorship and approached significance for delayed care-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: PIR emerged as a robust predictor of comorbid CVD with strongest protection among younger, racial/ethnic minority, and early-survivorship subgroups. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Clinical CVD risk models in breast cancer remain underspecified when measures of economic status are excluded. These findings support extending clinical guidance for CVD prevention beyond the current 5-year threshold and integrating economic screening into survivorship care.
From the paper
- Participants
A total of 250 surveys were removed for missing more than 15% of the variables of interest, leaving a final sample of 2553 women who had completed relevant survey questions.
- Primary outcome
CHD findings reflected the primary analysis, but the associations between adjacent PIR tiers had reduced significance (e.g., PIR ≤ 1.49 vs. 2.5–3.99: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.90, 2.18).
- Limitation
The respondents were predominantly non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors, reflecting limited racial and ethnic diversity among eligible NHIS respondents.
Quoted word for word from the full text on link.springer.com.
The paper
Morehouse School of Medicine; Wayne State University
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4 Sep 2026



