European Geriatric Medicine

Trial finds no reduction in hospital days with home geriatric care

Over 24 months, participants averaged 16.2 hospital days with added team-based care versus 17.6 with usual care alone, a difference that was not statistically significant.

Randomized trial in 450 older adults with multiple diagnosed diseases, against usual healthcare onlyInterventions

24 months, registered NCT02923843

Limit: With 450 participants, wide variation in hospital days could leave the trial underpowered

Edited by Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow

The randomized trial enrolled 450 adults aged 75 or older in southern Sweden who lived at home, had at least three diagnosed diseases and had visited an emergency department at least three times in the previous 18 months. Their average age was 83, and 245 were women.

Researchers assigned 225 participants to usual care plus comprehensive geriatric assessment—a review of medical, psychological, social and everyday needs—and care from a mobile team for 24 months. The other 225 received usual care alone. Hospital days did not differ significantly between groups. Neither did deaths, quality of life, physical performance, frailty—a reduced ability to withstand health problems—ability to manage daily activities, or thinking and memory.

Why it matters

Quality of life and the ability to manage daily tasks matter alongside survival in later life. The trial addressed whether coordinating care around older adults’ medical and everyday needs could improve these outcomes.

Caveats

This single-center trial involved people aged at least 75 with multiple diseases and frequent emergency visits, so its findings do not necessarily apply to other older populations. The authors questioned the intervention’s quality and speculated that limited continuity and team building could have contributed to the results.

From the paper

Participants

A total of 450 participants were recruited, with 225 in the intervention group and 225 in the control group.

Methods, Sample size

Who took part

Patients meeting the following inclusion criteria were included in the study: ≥ 75 years of age, ≥ 3 visits to the Emergency Department in the last 18 months, ≥ 3 diseases diagnosed according to different ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision) chapters, living in their own home and within the catchment area of Helsingborg Hospital …

Methods, Participants and recruitment

Ages

The mean age of all participants at baseline was 83 years and 245 were female (54%).

Results, Baseline data

Duration

The patients remained under the care of the interdisciplinary team for 24 months after recruitment.

Methods, Intervention group (IG)

Hospital days

At 24-month follow-up, the recorded mean cumulative number of days spent in hospital was not significantly different in the interventions and control groups.

Results, Primary outcome

Mortality

There was no difference in mortality between the groups, hazard ratio 1.14 (95% CI 0.77–1.71); p = 0.51, Fig..

Results, Secondary outcome

Frailty

Quality of life, number of hospital admissions, physical performance, frailty level, and ability to perform activities of daily living or cognition also did not differ significantly between the intervention and control group at 12- or 24-month follow-up.

Results, Secondary outcome

Quoted word for word from the full text on PubMed Central.