New papers delayed
Resolved. New papers are arriving normally again. 10:06 UTC
Investigating. New papers are arriving more slowly than usual. We’re looking into it. 04:51 UTC
Lasted 5 hours 15 minutes.
Status
Everything is running normally.
Checked at 22:21 UTC. The newest paper was read at 22:00 UTC and the newest story published at 16:24 UTC.
Last 30 daysLast 60 daysLast 90 days
- Running
- Delayed
- Down
- No data
Website
Running
Website: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
New papers
Running
New papers: running now. Over the last 90 days, delayed on 2 days, 97.16% uptime.
Judging
Running
Judging: running now. Over the last 90 days, delayed on 1 days, 99.84% uptime.
Stories
Running
Stories: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
Story pictures
Running
Story pictures: running now. Over the last 90 days, delayed on 2 days, 97.70% uptime.
Feeds
Running
Feeds: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
News
Running
News: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
Trials
Running
Trials: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
Email
Running
Email: running now. Over the last 90 days, no trouble recorded, 100% uptime.
Past incidents
Friday 9 October
No incidents.
Thursday 8 October
Story pictures delayed
Resolved. Pictures for new stories are appearing normally again. 11:06 UTC
Investigating. Pictures for new stories are taking longer than usual to appear. We’re looking into it. 04:36 UTC
Lasted 6 hours 30 minutes.
New papers delayed
Resolved. New papers are arriving normally again. 02:36 UTC
Investigating. New papers are arriving more slowly than usual. We’re looking into it. 00:21 UTC
Lasted 2 hours 15 minutes.
Wednesday 7 October
Story pictures delayed
Resolved. Pictures for new stories are appearing normally again. 8 Oct, 00:06 UTC
Investigating. Pictures for new stories are taking longer than usual to appear. We’re looking into it. 23:06 UTC
Lasted 1 hour.
New papers delayed
Resolved. New papers are arriving normally again. 23:51 UTC
Investigating. New papers are arriving more slowly than usual. We’re looking into it. 22:51 UTC
Lasted 1 hour.
New papers delayed
Resolved. New papers are arriving normally again. 22:06 UTC
Investigating. New papers are arriving more slowly than usual. We’re looking into it. 21:21 UTC
Lasted 45 minutes.
Judging delayed
Resolved. New papers are being judged normally again. 14:06 UTC
Investigating. New papers are waiting longer than usual to be judged, so they reach the feeds later. We’re looking into it. 13:36 UTC
Lasted 30 minutes.
5 to 6 October
No incidents.
Papers and stories
| Count | In the record | Last 30 days |
|---|---|---|
| Papers read | 345,902 | |
| About aging | 19,898 | |
| Stories | 919 | |
| Journals and servers | 9,131 |
Each day, last 30 days
Papers read7,869 on 8 Oct
About aging375 on 8 Oct
Core geroscience29 on 8 Oct
Stories87 on 8 Oct
| Day | Papers read | Preprints | About aging | Core geroscience | Stories | Journals and servers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thursday 8 October | 7,869 | 1,186 | 375 | 29 | 87 | 2,831 |
| Wednesday 7 October | 5,744 | 1,036 | 266 | 25 | 85 | 1,713 |
| Tuesday 6 October | 5,588 | 1,148 | 219 | 20 | 65 | 1,616 |
| Monday 5 October | 3,114 | 533 | 130 | 11 | 42 | 1,045 |
| Sunday 4 October | 3,174 | 562 | 124 | 9 | 41 | 854 |
| Saturday 3 October | 1,323 | 326 | 44 | 8 | 16 | 536 |
| Friday 2 October | 8,420 | 1,878 | 402 | 40 | 175 | 1,931 |
| Thursday 1 October | 5,812 | 962 | 249 | 25 | 85 | 1,730 |
| Wednesday 30 September | 5,767 | 1,234 | 238 | 37 | 68 | 1,634 |
| Tuesday 29 September | 4,274 | 977 | 184 | 20 | 79 | 1,470 |
| Monday 28 September | 8,714 | 168 | 272 | 34 | 64 | 1,419 |
| Sunday 27 September | 189 | 189 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Saturday 26 September | 8,351 | 760 | 344 | 39 | 39 | 1,947 |
| Friday 25 September | 895 | 855 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 24 |
| Thursday 24 September | 7,337 | 1,673 | 350 | 32 | 0 | 1,457 |
| Wednesday 23 September | 5,477 | 818 | 235 | 26 | 0 | 1,770 |
| Tuesday 22 September | 5,466 | 1,038 | 208 | 23 | 0 | 1,617 |
| Monday 21 September | 3,829 | 650 | 167 | 13 | 0 | 1,351 |
| Sunday 20 September | 1,070 | 194 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 437 |
| Saturday 19 September | 3,231 | 518 | 120 | 9 | 0 | 1,159 |
| Friday 18 September | 5,816 | 913 | 256 | 18 | 0 | 1,717 |
| Thursday 17 September | 5,064 | 888 | 189 | 20 | 0 | 1,712 |
| Wednesday 16 September | 5,167 | 886 | 209 | 18 | 0 | 1,658 |
| Tuesday 15 September | 9,300 | 813 | 337 | 22 | 0 | 1,757 |
| Monday 14 September | 2,439 | 324 | 99 | 9 | 0 | 733 |
| Sunday 13 September | 4,473 | 269 | 168 | 17 | 0 | 1,468 |
| Saturday 12 September | 890 | 784 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 59 |
| Friday 11 September | 5,884 | 957 | 242 | 23 | 0 | 1,725 |
| Thursday 10 September | 5,411 | 879 | 219 | 23 | 0 | 1,679 |
| Wednesday 9 September | 5,839 | 1,132 | 250 | 23 | 0 | 1,702 |
From papers read to stories, Thursday 8 October
- Papers read
- 7,869
- About aging
- 3751 in 21
- Core geroscience
- 291 in 271
- Stories
- 871 in 90
How the papers about aging were done
- Humans11,894, 60%
- Review3,109, 16%
- Human trial1,824, 9%
- Animals1,270, 6%
- In silico949, 5%
- Cells371, 2%
- Research288, 1%
- Model organisms193, under 1%
Countries, last 90 days
- United States28%
- China26%
- United Kingdom8%
- Japan5%
- South Korea5%
- Canada4%
- Germany4%
- Italy4%
- Australia4%
- Spain4%
Funders, last 90 days
- National Natural Science Foundation of China7%
- National Institutes of Health7%
- National Institute on Aging3%
- European Commission2%
- National Key Research and Development Program of China1%
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science1%
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute1%
- Medical Research Council1%
- National Cancer Institute1%
- National Research Foundation of Korea1%
Standards
ARN reads every new paper in PubMed, bioRxiv and medRxiv, new biology and biomedical computing papers on arXiv, new papers on Research Square and other preprint servers, and the journals whose articles no longer reach PubMed.
A judging model answers six questions about each paper: how relevant its own work is to aging, what link to aging that work shows, how newsworthy it is, what kind of study it is, what it mainly establishes, and whether it is promotional.
A paper gets a story when it is primary research that the judging model finds more likely than not relevant to aging, with the link shown in its own work, scores at least 1 out of 3 for newsworthiness and is not promotional. Reviews get none.
An AI writer writes each story from the paper's abstract and, where the paper's licence is open, excerpts of its methods and results, in plain words for a reader outside the field. When it cannot, another AI writer writes the story from the same text under the same rules.
The judging model then scores the story against that text, from 0 (contradicts the paper) to 3 (fully faithful). A story below 1.9 is not published.
A second model then reads each story that passes for claims that go further than the paper: about what kind of paper it is, how the study was done, which organism or population each result came from, and why it matters. A story it flags goes back to the writer, and a story is published only when both pass it.
Figures are the papers' own, shown with their credit and licence; other pictures are posters drawn for ARN. A story shown to misreport its paper is corrected or withdrawn. Write to us from the contact page.