One treatment does not fit all: Indications that spinning therapy benefits only a subgroup of patients with depression characterized by a T memory cell inflation profile
Abstract
A proportion of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) exhibit signs of premature T cell aging, i.e. memory T cell inflation, characterized by elevated levels of memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. Physical endurance training, including spinning therapy (ST), is known to counteract both T cell aging and depression. The primary aim of this randomized, treatment-as-usual (TAU)-controlled study was to investigate whether signs of T cell aging (determined prior to ST) characterized remitters and responders to the intervention. Patients aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of MDD (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) ≥ 13) were included and randomized 1:1 to TAU or TAU + ST. The intervention consisted of moderate-intensity cycling sessions (30 min, three times per week), for eight consecutive weeks. A total of 72 patients (n = 35 TAU, n = 37 TAU + ST) with complete baseline immunophenotyping were included in the analyses (49 % females; mean age, 32 years). We found that remitters to TAU + ST displayed significantly higher baseline levels of CD8⁺ memory T cells, particularly T central memory (Tcm) cells and T effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) cells, compared to non-remitters. Correction for potential confounders and logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline levels of CD8⁺ Tcm cells showed the strongest predictive value in the TAU + ST group (OR = 7.66, P = 0.03), suggesting that these cells may serve as treatment-specific predictors of remission to adjunctive ST. Post hoc stratification of patients based on the levels of CD8⁺Tcm cells identified a subgroup of n = 20 patients exhibiting several signs of T cell inflation in both the CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T memory cell populations. This subgroup was older and showed a higher prevalence of cytomegalovirus seropositivity, suggesting a state of post-infectious T cell senescence. In addition, this subgroup was characterized by higher remission rates to TAU + ST compared to TAU alone, particularly in the long run (i.e., 75 % vs. 42 % at week 8, and 75 % vs. 17 % at the end of the follow-up phase at week 24, P = 0.03; note the small group sizes of n = 8 and n = 12 patients, respectively). Although no significant effects of add-on ST on CD8⁺ memory T cells were found, adjunctive ST significantly increased naïve CD4⁺ T cells and decreased effector memory CD4⁺ T cells within the senescent subgroup. Add-on ST was not superior to TAU in the entire group of patients with MDD. Taken together, our findings suggest that patients with MDD with a T memory cell inflation profile may be the one and only who would benefit from TAU + ST as an add-on treatment strategy. These results support the development of personalized psychiatry approaches guided by immunological profiling and challenge the conventional "one-size-fit" treatment model in depression. However, given the small sample size, particularly in the subgroup of interest, the outcomes should be considered preliminary and warrant replication in larger, confirmatory studies.
The paper
University Hospital Münster; The University of Melbourne
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 18 Dec 2025

