bioRxiv

Brain scan charts map white matter spots across adult life

An observational analysis of 42,469 brain lesion maps from 12 adult cohorts produced reference charts comparing the amount and location of white matter changes.

Paper by M. J. Alshikho, J. D. Pyne, N. C. Edwards, +33 more authorsAlzheimers Disease Sequencing Project
A brain cross-section with dense white matter spots sits beside two smaller sections showing sparse spots and a more widely scattered pattern.

Our read

AI & data
Studied:
Preprint: study of adults from multiple study cohorts
What changed:
White matter spot locations varied with age; reference charts ranked both affected tissue amount and how typical its location was
The catch:
The charts capture disease associations, not the underlying causes of an individual's lesion pattern
Why it’s aging research:
Change across ages, or exceptional longevity.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

Adults in 12 study groups were represented by 42,469 brain-scan lesion maps in an observational analysis of white matter hyperintensities—bright areas in the brain’s connecting tissue. The researchers built age- and sex-specific reference maps using cognitively unimpaired individuals. They created charts ranking both the amount of affected tissue and how typical its location was.

Grouping scans by these two rankings revealed graded associations with disease processes linked to Alzheimer’s and related dementias, nerve-cell degeneration and cognitive impairment. Among individuals with similar lesion volumes, different location patterns were associated with aging-related, blood-vessel and nerve-cell degeneration processes. The authors presented the charts as a benchmark for measuring departures from typical patterns of brain aging.

Why it matters

White matter hyperintensities are linked to cognitive decline, dementia and stroke. Reference charts offer a way to study how individual patterns depart from those typical of brain aging.

Caveats

The observational links do not establish which underlying processes produced an individual’s lesion pattern. The work is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.

Comments

Be the first to comment.