Physiology-guided complete revascularization

Physiology-guided complete revascularization has been studied in 4 papers since 2024: 4 trials in people. The newest paper, Oct 25, 2025: “Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease”.

Intervention

4 papers study it9 findingsUpdated

See all 4 papers on physiology-guided complete revascularization

At a glance

The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 1 lab in 2 countries.

“Complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint in both subgroups (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.89 for patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2”
Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel DiseaseJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2025doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.09.019

None of its findings points the other way.

Humans: a single group. Cells, worms or flies and mice: nothing yet.
  • 1 lab in 2 countries
  • Funders: General Electric and 2 more
  • 9 of 9 findings with company ties
  • Human trial4

Studies in people

4 studies gave physiology-guided complete revascularization to people and measured what changed.

What changedDesignPeopleSource

down: Decreases death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularizationHR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.89

no change: Has no effect on acute kidney injuryHR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.43

Randomized trial3-year1,445 peopleaged ≥75 yearsOlder adults; The oldest old; older MI patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, Oct 25, 2025

down: Lowers the risk of death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularizationHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.88

down: Lowers the risk of cardiovascular death or MIHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88

down: Lowers the risk of heart failure hospitalizationsHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.97

Randomized trial3 years1,445 peopleBothmedian 80 yearsOlder adults; older patients with MI and multivessel diseaseJAMA cardiology, Aug 31, 2025

up: Improves angina status7.3 [95% CI, 6.1-8.6] points

up: Improves quality of life6.2 [95% CI, 4.4-8.1] points

up: Improves physical function1.1 [95% CI, 0.9-1.3] points

Randomized trial1 year1,445 peopleBothaged ≥75 yearsOlder adults; The oldest old; myocardial infarction and multivessel diseaseCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, Jun 18, 2024

down: Lowers the risk of ischaemic adverse events

Randomized trial1,445 people≥75 yearsOlder adults; myocardial infarction and multivessel diseaseEuropean journal of preventive cardiology, Mar 7, 2024

What did studies of physiology-guided complete revascularization find?

5

Studies of physiology-guided complete revascularization measured 5 outcomes; the most studied are acute kidney injury (1 study), death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization (1) and physical function (1).

Acute kidney injury

no changein humans1HR 1.11

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization showed no clear effect on acute kidney injury in humans (older MI patients with multivessel disease) (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.43).

    “Contrast-associated acute kidney injury occurred in 245 patients (17%), increased progressively across Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stages (P < 0.001), and was similar between treatment arms (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.43).”

    Human trialolder MI patients with multivessel disease

    Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

    JACC. Cardiovascular interventions

More on Acute kidney injury

Death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization

downin humans1HR 0.68

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization decreases death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization in humans (older MI patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.89).

    “Complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint in both subgroups (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.89 for patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2”

    Human trialolder MI patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m23-year

    Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

    JACC. Cardiovascular interventions

Physical function

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization improves physical function in humans (myocardial infarction and multivessel disease) (1.1 [95% CI, 0.9-1.3] points).

    “and physical performance (short physical performance battery, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.9-1.3] points)”

    Human trialmyocardial infarction and multivessel disease1 year

    Health-Status Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Strategy

    Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

Quality of life

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization improves quality of life in humans (myocardial infarction and multivessel disease) (6.2 [95% CI, 4.4-8.1] points).

    “health-related quality of life (EQ visual analog scale, 6.2 [95% CI, 4.4-8.1] points)”

    Human trialmyocardial infarction and multivessel disease1 year

    Health-Status Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Strategy

    Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

Angina status

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization improves angina status in humans (myocardial infarction and multivessel disease) (7.3 [95% CI, 6.1-8.6] points).

    “Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with greater improvement in terms of angina status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, 7.3 [95% CI, 6.1-8.6] points)”

    Human trialmyocardial infarction and multivessel disease1 year

    Health-Status Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Strategy

    Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

What is physiology-guided complete revascularization linked with?

4

Studies link physiology-guided complete revascularization with 4 measures, most often heart failure hospitalizations (1 study), cardiovascular death or MI (1) and death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization (1).

Heart failure hospitalizations

downin humans1HR 0.73

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization lowers the risk of heart failure hospitalizations in humans (older patients with MI and multivessel disease) (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.97).

    “Hospitalizations for heart failure were more frequent in the culprit-only group compared with the physiology-guided complete group (143 [19.7%] vs 103 [14.3%]; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .03).”

    Human trialolder patients with MI and multivessel disease3 yearsn = 1,445

    Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    JAMA cardiology

Cardiovascular death or MI

downin humans1HR 0.66

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization lowers the risk of cardiovascular death or MI in humans (older patients with MI and multivessel disease) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88).

    “cardiovascular death or MI occurred in a significantly lower number of patients in the physiology-guided complete revascularization group (92 patients [12.8%]) compared with the culprit-only group (132 patients [18.2%]; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.88; P = .004).”

    Human trialolder patients with MI and multivessel disease3 yearsn = 1,445

    Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    JAMA cardiology

Death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization

downin humans1HR 0.72

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization lowers the risk of death, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization in humans (older patients with MI and multivessel disease) (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.88).

    “the primary outcome occurred in 165 patients (22.9%) in the physiology-guided complete revascularization group and 216 patients (29.8%) in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.88; P = .002).”

    Human trialolder patients with MI and multivessel disease3 yearsn = 1,445

    Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    JAMA cardiology

Ischaemic adverse events

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Physiology-guided complete revascularization lowers the risk of ischaemic adverse events in humans (myocardial infarction and multivessel disease).

    “Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status.”

    Human trialmyocardial infarction and multivessel diseasen = 1,445

    Impact of pre-admission physical activity on benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction: insights from the FIRE trial

    European journal of preventive cardiology

More on Ischaemic adverse events

Latest