Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has been studied in 32 papers since 2021: 3 trials and 20 observational studies in people, 8 reviews; 14 in the past year. The newest paper, Nov 3, 2026: “Cardioprotection and Heart Failure Management in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A State-of-the-Art Review Across Pediatric and Transitional Age”.

Intervention

32 papers study it10 findingsUpdated

5 new papers in 30 daysSee all 32 papers on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

At a glance

Independent labs found the same change in people. 4 independent labs in 4 countries.

“ICD therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality among participants with low frailty burden (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78)”
Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HFJACC. Heart failure2023doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.009

2 of its findings point the other way.

Humans: replicated by independent labs. Cells, worms or flies and mice: nothing yet.
  • 4 independent labs in 4 countries
  • 2 findings against
  • Funders: Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research and 6 more
  • 2 of 5 findings with company ties
  • Human trial3
  • Humans20
  • In silico1

Studies in people

2 studies gave implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to people and measured what changed.

What changedDesignPeopleSource

no change: Has no effect on mortalityHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68–1.24

Randomized trial1,116 peopleClass 1 FI <0.210 in patients with nonischemic HFrEFThe American journal of cardiology, Sep 23, 2025

down: Decreases mortalityHR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78

no change: Has no effect on mortalityHR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09

Randomized trial1,676 peopleBothmean age: 59 ± 12 yearsMidlife adults; low frailty burden (FI ≤ median) in HFrEFJACC. Heart failure, Aug 9, 2023

What did studies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator find?

2

Studies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator measured 2 outcomes; the most studied are mortality (5 studies) and sudden cardiac death (2).

Mortality

downin humans3no changein humans3HR 0.56–0.92

5 studies
  1. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator showed no clear effect on mortality in humans (class 1 FI <0.210 in patients with nonischemic HFrEF) (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68–1.24).

    “The effect of ICD implantation on all-cause death did not vary significantly by frailty class (class 1, HR 0.92 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.24]; class 2 to 3, 0.93 [0.73 to 1.19]; Pinteraction = 0.99).”

    Human trialclass 1 FI <0.210 in patients with nonischemic HFrEF

    Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Frailty in Non-ischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Extended Follow-Up of the DANISH Trial

    The American journal of cardiology

  2. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator showed no clear effect on mortality in humans (high frailty burden (FI > median) in HFrEF) (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09).

    “but not among those with high frailty burden (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09).”

    Human trialhigh frailty burden (FI > median) in HFrEF23% womens

    Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HF

    JACC. Heart failure

  3. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decreases mortality in humans (low frailty burden (FI ≤ median) in HFrEF) (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78).

    “ICD therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality among participants with low frailty burden (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78)”

    Human triallow frailty burden (FI ≤ median) in HFrEF23% womens

    Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HF

    JACC. Heart failure

  4. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is linked with less mortality in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and aborted cardiac arrest.

    “whereas acute myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) and the presence of an ICD improved prognosis.”

    Humansin patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and aborted cardiac arrestn = 2,259

    Impact of age on the prognosis of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and aborted cardiac arrest

    Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie

  5. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decreases mortality in selected subpopulation of patients with HFrEF.

    “nonpharmacological approaches such as implantable cardiac defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, moderate physical activity and several other new treatment approaches have been shown to decrease mortality in selected subpopulation of patients with HFrEF”

    Reviewin selected subpopulation of patients with HFrEF

    Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: From Mechanisms to Winning Team of Management

    Preprints.orgPreprint

  6. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator showed no clear effect on mortality in several patient groups previously considered to have a high risk.

    “Recent studies further demonstrated that a universal survival benefit due to an ICD is absent in several patient groups previously considered to have a high risk.”

    Reviewin several patient groups previously considered to have a high risk

    Sudden cardiac death in structural heart disease : Update on prevention

    Herz

Sudden cardiac death

downin humans1downin silico1

2 studies
  1. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prevents sudden cardiac death in silico (56% (48-62%)).

    “a 56% (48-62%) efficacy for ICDs to reduce SCDs or similar events”

    In silicofive-year horizon

    Clinically relevant risk threshold for predicting sudden cardiac death

    medRxivPreprint

  2. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator protects against sudden cardiac death in humans.

    “highlighting the concept of competing risks of non-arrhythmic death, which attenuates the potential benefit of ICDs with advancing age.”

    Review

    The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly

    Progress in cardiovascular diseases

More on Sudden cardiac death

What is implantable cardioverter-defibrillator linked with?

2

Studies link implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with 2 measures, most often infection (1 study) and survival (1).

Infection

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator raises the risk of infection in humans.

    “The risk-benefit ratio is further complicated by a heightened risk of procedural and long-term complications, including device-related infections and pocket integrity issues such as skin erosion.”

    Review

    The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly

    Progress in cardiovascular diseases

More on Infection

Survival

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is associated with survival in humans (primary prevention ICD implantation) (45.7% (95% CI 44.0%-47.4%)).

    “Ten year survival was 45.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 44.0 %-47.4 %).”

    Humansprimary prevention ICD implantation10-yearn = 3,399

    Predicting long-term survival after de novo cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary prevention: A population based study

    Heliyon

Latest

Dec 2025: 2Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 2Mar 2026: 3Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 4Nov 2026: 114 papers in 12 months

See all 32 papers on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator