Familial loss of a loved one
1 paper4 findings
- 1 lab in 1 country
- Funders: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and 3 more
- Humans1
Outcomes
1Horvath clock
no changein humans1
1 study
Horvath clock
no changein humans1
Familial loss of a loved one has no effect on Horvath clock in humans (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.06).
“there were no associations with 2 or more losses for the Horvath clock (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.06).”
Humans2 or more familial losses compared with no losses; no association detectedblood24 yearsn = 3,963
Familial Loss of a Loved One and Biological Aging: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program
JAMA network open1 Jul 2024
Associations
3DunedinPACE
upin humans1
1 study
DunedinPACE
upin humans1
Familial loss of a loved one is associated with DunedinPACE in humans (β = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.34).
“DunedinPACE β = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.34) compared with those with no losses.”
Humans2 or more familial losses compared with no lossesblood24 yearsn = 3,963
Familial Loss of a Loved One and Biological Aging: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program
JAMA network open1 Jul 2024
GrimAge
upin humans1
1 study
GrimAge
upin humans1
Familial loss of a loved one is associated with GrimAge in humans (β = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.45).
“GrimAge β = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.45;”
Humans2 or more familial losses compared with no lossesblood24 yearsn = 3,963
Familial Loss of a Loved One and Biological Aging: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program
JAMA network open1 Jul 2024
PhenoAge
upin humans1
1 study
PhenoAge
upin humans1
Familial loss of a loved one is associated with PhenoAge in humans (β = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28).
“Those who experienced 2 or more losses tended to have older biological ages for several of the clocks (PhenoAge β = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28;”
Humans2 or more familial losses compared with no lossesblood24 yearsn = 3,963
Familial Loss of a Loved One and Biological Aging: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program
JAMA network open1 Jul 2024