Retinal thickness has no effect on cognitive function in humans (f 2 <0 in 73–91% of models).
“Adding retinal thickness actually slightly lowered the explanatory ability of 73–91% of OLS and PLS models respectively in all participants (f 2 <0).”
NfL is associated with retinal thickness in humans (r = -0.7 to -0.9, p < 0.05).
“The amyloid‐positive groups retinal thicknesses across various regions had stronger negative associations of GFAP and NFL ( r = ‐0.7 to ‐0.9, p = <0.05) than the amyloid‐negative group ( r = ‐0.63 to ‐0.8, p = <0.05).”
Glial fibrillary acidic protein is associated with retinal thickness in humans (r = -0.7 to -0.9, p < 0.05).
“The amyloid‐positive groups retinal thicknesses across various regions had stronger negative associations of GFAP and NFL ( r = ‐0.7 to ‐0.9, p = <0.05) than the amyloid‐negative group ( r = ‐0.63 to ‐0.8, p = <0.05).”
Retinal thickness predicts cognitive function in humans (f 2 = 0.04–0.13).
“The contribution of retinal thickness towards estimating cognitive measures was markedly improved in the AD subgroup using PLS to estimate MoCA total score and composite scores of executive functions”
In 28,657 adults, higher brain care scores were linked to thicker retinal layers, and each five-unit increase was tied to a smaller retinal age gap.In 28,657 adults, higher brain care scores were linked to thicker retinal layers, and each five-unit increase was tied to a smaller retinal age gap.
Across 46,836 adults, each standard deviation increase in retinal nerve fiber layer asymmetry was linked to hazard ratios from ~1.07 for atrial fibrillation to 1.15 for…Across 46,836 adults, each standard deviation increase in retinal nerve fiber layer asymmetry was linked to hazard ratios from ~1.07 for atrial fibrillation to 1.15 for heart failure.