medRxiv

Sex-aware Cross-tissue Regulatory Transformer Identified Sexually Dimorphic Alzheimer's Disease Risk Loci and Causal Cellular Circuit

Preprint: genetic association study of 449,335 peopleBiomarkers
Follow

Abstract

Sex differences in Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic effects and regulatory contexts remain incompletely resolved. We analyzed 449,335 European-ancestry participants using sex-stratified and genotype-by-sex models and developed STAGE-AD, a Transformer integrating molecular QTLs, epigenomic and single-cell annotations. Sex-stratified analyses identified eight female and three male genome-wide-significant signals provisionally classified as novel. Primary test-set area under the precision-recall curve was 0.895 (95% confidence interval, 0.877-0.912), decreasing to 0.751 under locus hold-out and 0.681 under APOE-region hold-out. Statistical-genetic integration in independent HUNT and MVP cohorts supported 236 genes at 106 loci. Prespecified lifetime-risk assumptions yielded liability-scale SNP heritabilities of 11.42% in females and 9.23% in males. Ablations indicated that female-biased predictions depended on glial annotations and male-biased predictions on endothelial and oligodendrocyte annotations. Eleven candidate variant-gene-tissue-cell-pathology chains were evaluated using multi-omics and neuropathological data from 579 NPAD brain donors. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex-specific genetic architectures in the study of health conditions, including Alzheimers disease, paving the way for more targeted treatment strategies.

From the paper

Participants

After harmonized sample-level quality control and removal of cross-cohort overlap, the European-ancestry discovery analysis included 449,335 participants: 259,298 females and 190,037 males (Supplementary Data 1).

Results, Sex-stratified GWAS and genotype-by-sex interaction analysis

Result

The highest decile was also enriched for fine-mapped variants with posterior inclusion probability (PIP) ≥ 0.50 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.43–5.62; P = 0.003) …

Results, STAGE-AD prioritization performance

Quoted word for word from the full text on medRxiv.

The paper

Jinan University; Cornell University

medRxiv, 9 Sep 2026, CC0, Preprint, not peer-reviewed

doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.26362488