Cell Reports

Calorie restriction improves metabolism in animal experiments

Animal experiments matching food intake and fasting duration found better glucose and fat metabolism with daily calorie restriction than with fasting-refeeding cycles.

Graphical abstract from Cell Reports
Open the figure at full size
Graphical abstract. Velingkaar et al.
Studied:
Experiments in animals, against animals undergoing fasting-refeeding-fasting cycles
What changed:
Calorie restriction improved glucose and fat metabolism compared with fasting-refeeding cycles
The catch:
The abstract does not report how long the feeding regimens lasted
In the record:
One of 4,194 papers on caloric restriction on record: 638 with results in people, 1,499 in animals. Its result on glucose metabolism agrees with 2 of 3 other findings on record; 1 points the other way.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

In animals, researchers compared calorie restriction with one meal a day against a fasting-refeeding-fasting schedule. They controlled food intake and fasting duration to examine how the metabolic responses differed.

Calorie restriction improved glucose and fatty acid metabolism, while fasting led to difficulty handling glucose and fat accumulation in the liver. Calorie restriction also strengthened daily biological rhythms and coordination among genes involved in metabolism. Fasting-refeeding cycles disrupted these patterns. Changes in digestion and metabolic measures suggested that food leaving the stomach served as a primary metabolic trigger during short-term fasting. The authors concluded that calorie restriction engaged metabolic regulation that operated in anticipation of nutrient cues and aligned with the body clock. Fasting-refeeding cycles instead relied on direct nutrient cues.

Why it matters

Fasting contributes to calorie restriction’s metabolic and longevity benefits. This comparison addresses whether fasting-refeeding cycles engage the same metabolic regulation as calorie restriction.

Caveats

These findings came from animal experiments, not studies in people. The abstract does not identify the species or report how long the feeding regimens lasted.

Comments

Be the first to comment.