Journal of Hazardous Materials

Fine particles worsened marrow stem cell function in diabetic mice

In a chamber experiment, artificial air pollution worsened dysfunction in bone marrow stem cells in mice with type 2 diabetes.

Paper by Shankar Rijal, Govinda Bhattarai, Jeong-Chae Lee, Sung-Ho Kook · Jeonbuk National University

Our read

Mechanisms
Studied:
Experiments in mice with type 2 diabetes, against non-diabetic mice
What changed:
Blood-forming stem cells from diabetic mice showed greater senescence and functional deficits than those from non-diabetic mice
The catch:
The abstract does not report the exposure dose or duration
In the record:
One of 669 papers on fine particulate matter on record: 495 with results in people, 12 in animals. Its result on cellular senescence agrees with all 12 other findings on record.
Why it’s aging research:
It studies something that builds up in the body with age.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

Researchers exposed mice with and without type 2 diabetes to artificial fine-particle air pollution in a chamber designed to mimic real-world conditions. In this animal experiment, exposure pushed the bone marrow toward an aged state.

Stem cells that can form bone and fat showed senescence, a state in which cells stop dividing. They also favored fat formation over bone formation. Blood-forming stem cells from diabetic mice showed greater senescence and reduced ability to form colonies and replenish blood cells compared with those from non-diabetic mice. An inhibitor of NLRP3, a protein involved in inflammation, reversed the harmful effects on both stem cell types in diabetic mice. The authors concluded that pollution worsened diabetes-related stem cell dysfunction at least partly by activating an inflammation-related protein complex containing NLRP3.

Why it matters

Stem cell senescence is relevant to aging in bone marrow. The study addresses how environmental pollution and diabetes may interact in this process.

Caveats

The mouse experiment does not establish how human bone marrow responds. The abstract does not report the exposure dose or duration, limiting comparison with everyday human exposure.

Comments

Be the first to comment.