The Journal of Rheumatology

Arthritis drugs may be linked to lower osteoporosis risk

Compared with no biologic exposure, adjusted osteoporosis hazard ratios—a measure of relative risk—were 0.83 for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and 0.19 for interleukin-17 inhibitors.

Paper by Oh Chan Kwon, Hye Sun Lee, So Young Jeon, Min-Chan Park · Yonsei University

Our read

Populations
Studied:
Cohort study of 37,708 people with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
What changed:
Osteoporosis risk was lower with TNFi (hazard ratio 0.83) and IL-17i (0.19) compared with the bDMARD-naive group
The catch:
Outcomes were identified from diagnosis codes
In the record:
One of 6 papers on IL-17 inhibitors on record: 3 with results in people.
Why it’s aging research:
A leading disease of aging, its risks or menopause.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

A nationwide observational cohort study followed 37,708 people with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, a form of inflammatory spinal arthritis visible on X-rays. Researchers compared two classes of biologic drugs, which target inflammation-related proteins: tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors. Follow-up ran from arthritis diagnosis through December 2021.

Both classes were associated with lower risk of osteoporosis, a condition that weakens bones, compared with no biologic exposure. Interleukin-17 inhibitors were also associated with lower osteoporosis risk than tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with lower spine-fracture risk, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.64 versus no biologic exposure. For interleukin-17 inhibitors, the estimated spine-fracture risk was lower, but the range of likely values included no difference. Hip-fracture risk did not differ across groups.

Why it matters

Osteoporosis and fractures are concerns in aging, making bone health relevant when comparing drugs for inflammatory spinal arthritis.

Caveats

The observational design cannot establish cause and effect, and outcomes were identified from diagnosis codes. The findings may not apply to people without this form of spinal arthritis.

Comments

Be the first to comment.