Bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty has been studied in 9 papers since 2021: 1 trial and 8 observational studies in people. The newest paper, Aug 6, 2025: “A Fragile Balance: Survival Analysis Following Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in the Elderly”.

Intervention

9 papers study it8 findingsUpdated

See all 9

“A total of 24 months after HA, the total WOMAC score and its subcomponents showed no statistically significant difference between the unipolar and bipolar groups.”
Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trialBone & joint open2023doi:10.1302/2633-1462.45.bjo-2023-0026.r1

None of its findings points the other way.

  • 4 independent labs in 4 countries
  • Funders: Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research and 2 more
  • 4 of 8 findings with company ties
  • Human trial1
  • Humans8

Studies in people

1 study gave bipolar hemiarthroplasty to people and measured what changed.

What did studies of Bipolar hemiarthroplasty find?

7

Studies of Bipolar hemiarthroplasty measured 7 outcomes; the most studied are SF-12 PCS (1 study), muscle strength (1) and ambulatory function (1).

SF-12 PCS

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed no clear effect on SF-12 PCS in humans.

    “Among all study participants, the WOMAC score and subcomponent scores along with SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were not statistically significantly different between receiving a UH and a BH 24 months postoperatively.”

    Human trial24monthsn = 746

    Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Bone & joint open

  2. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed no clear effect on SF-12 PCS in humans (displaced femoral neck fracture).

    “Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found in the PCS and MCS scores of the SF-12 questionnaire.”

    Human trialdisplaced femoral neck fracture24 monthsn = 746

    Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Bone & joint open

More on SF-12 PCS

Muscle strength

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is linked with better muscle strength in humans (preinjury Functional Ambulation Category 3) (GMT 3.56 vs 3.18, p = 0.01).

    “there was a significant between-group difference at FAC 3 (early group, GMT score = 3.56; delay group, GMT score = 3.18 [p = 0.01])”

    Humanspreinjury Functional Ambulation Category 3

    Timely Surgical Intervention for Hip Fractures is Essential to Reinstate Ambulatory Function on Discharge: Propensity Score Matching

    JB & JS open access

Ambulatory function

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is linked with better ambulatory function in humans (preinjury Functional Ambulation Category 3) (FIM 3.44 vs 2.31, p = 0.005).

    “For preinjury Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) 3, there was a notable contrast between the early (FIM: 3.44) and delay groups (FIM: 2.31) (p = 0.005).”

    Humanspreinjury Functional Ambulation Category 3

    Timely Surgical Intervention for Hip Fractures is Essential to Reinstate Ambulatory Function on Discharge: Propensity Score Matching

    JB & JS open access

Weight-bearing ability

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed no clear effect on weight-bearing ability in humans (femoral neck fracture) (maximum peak force 80.6% ± 19.5 vs 78.9% ± 21.6; average peak force 66.8% ± 15.8 vs 60.5% ± 15.6).

    “In our study, BA did not allow for a significantly higher average and maximum loading capacity compared with THA.”

    Human trialfemoral neck fractureearly postoperative periodn = 39

    Early Postoperative Weight-Bearing Ability after Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture

    Journal of clinical medicine

WOMAC

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed no clear effect on WOMAC in humans.

    “Among all study participants, the WOMAC score and subcomponent scores along with SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were not statistically significantly different between receiving a UH and a BH 24 months postoperatively.”

    Human trial24monthsn = 746

    Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Bone & joint open

WOMAC

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed no clear effect on WOMAC in humans (displaced femoral neck fracture).

    “A total of 24 months after HA, the total WOMAC score and its subcomponents showed no statistically significant difference between the unipolar and bipolar groups.”

    Human trialdisplaced femoral neck fracture24 monthsn = 746

    Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Bone & joint open

More on WOMAC

Operation time

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty decreases operation time in humans (intertrochanteric fractures) (94.38 vs 125.76 min).

    “The operation time was (125.76 ± 33.49) min and (94.38 ± 20.94) min in PFNA group and BHA group (P < 0.05)”

    Human trialintertrochanteric fractures

    Comparison of Clinical Outcomes With Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Elderly Intertrochanteric Fractures

    Research SquarePreprint

Latest