There are 3 papers on Hmax/Mmax ratio in aging research: 2 trials and 1 observational study in people.
3 papers study it3 more mention it3 findings
- Human trial2
- Humans1
Interventions
2Short-foot exercise
no changein humans1
1 study
Short-foot exercise
no changein humans1
Short-foot exercise showed no clear effect on Hmax/Mmax ratio in humans (combined with sensorimotor training) (F = 0.097, p = 0.757).
“Regarding the Hmax/Mmax ratio, there was a significant difference in the main effect on time (F = 21.478, p < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the main effects between groups (F = 0.038, p = 0.848) and group-by-time interaction effects (F = 0.097, p = 0.757).”
Human trialcombined with sensorimotor trainingsix weeksn = 32
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
Short-foot exercise showed no clear effect on Hmax/Mmax ratio in humans (flat foot).
“However, the Hmax/Mmax ratio was not significantly different between the two groups.”
Human trialflat footsix weeksn = 32
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
Maximal strength training
no changein humans1
1 study
Maximal strength training
no changein humans1
Maximal strength training showed no clear effect on Hmax/Mmax ratio in humans (no change in any group).
“No changes were observed in Hmax/Mmax ratio for the groups.”
Human trialno change in any group3 weeksn = 36
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences