Research Square

Short survey reliably measured physical function in older adults

The 10-question scale halved administration time compared with the 25-question version and was tested in an independent sample of 263 older adults.

Figure 1. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (n = 256)
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (n = 256)Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (n = 256)Kim et al.
Preprint: study of 114 adults aged 50 years and olderBiomarkers

519 participants, cohort study, dose-response, independent replication

Limit: Ceiling scores limit discrimination among highly functioning older adults

Follow

In an observational study of 519 adults aged 50 years and older, researchers developed a shorter questionnaire to assess physical functioning. They selected 10 questions from the 25-item Life Functioning scale using statistical analysis and a review of what the questions covered. They then tested the shorter scale in an independent sample of 263 older adults.

The short scale assessed physical functioning, or the ability to carry out physical activities. Scores were strongly associated with those from the original questionnaire and another physical functioning scale. It showed strong consistency across questions and when people completed it again. Baseline scores were associated with physical functioning and self-rated health six months later in a follow-up subsample.

Why it matters

The work addressed how national health surveys can assess older adults’ physical functioning while reducing the burden of lengthy questionnaires.

Caveats

The six-month findings were observational associations, not evidence of cause and effect, and the abstract did not report the follow-up subsample’s size. The study is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.

From the paper

Result

Baseline LF-10 scores were prospectively associated with SRH at six months (Wald = 3.937, p < 0.05), although the association was modest (estimate = 0.054, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.107).

Results, Predictive Validity

Limitation

First, item thresholds were concentrated below the mean (− 2.39 to − 0.60), so the LF-10 measures less precisely at higher functioning levels (θ > 0); future revisions should consider adding higher-demand physical tasks to extend the measurement range.

Limitations and Future Directions

Quoted word for word from the full text on researchsquare.com.