Organ age acceleration and mortality risk reflect distinct biological processes
Multi-omics clocks across fourteen organs reveal divergent molecular programs and uncover thirteen candidate genes separating age acceleration from mortality.
Research Square · Na R et al. · Paper published 30 Sep 2026
In a preprint analyzing 409,206 human participants from the UK Biobank, researchers built multi-omics clocks to measure the aging of 14 organs. The team integrated nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics, plasma proteomics, and clinical phenotypes to assess both organ-specific age acceleration and mortality.
They found that chronological age acceleration and mortality risk represent distinct biological dimensions with separate molecular and genetic architectures. Single-platform models missed complementary biology spanning three distinct molecular layers. For example, clocks trained on all-cause mortality missed incident prostate cancer signals that an organ-specific mortality clock detected. Using a validation cohort of 383,227 individuals and bidirectional Mendelian randomization, the authors prioritized 13 candidate genes driving these divergent aging dimensions.
Why it matters
The findings show that conventional single-rate aging clocks overlook critical tissue-level differences, establishing that biological age acceleration and death risk operate via separable biological programs. Disentangling these mechanisms could improve organ-resolved risk profiling and support targeted therapeutic interventions.
Caveats
This work is a preprint that has not yet undergone peer review. The findings are based on observational data from the UK Biobank, which may not capture variations in more diverse global populations.
Written from the paper’s abstract, and every claim checked against it before publishing. Read the paper for the full methods and data.
The paper
Age Acceleration and Mortality Risk Constitute Distinct Dimensions of Organ Aging
Na R, Shi C, Ruan X et al.
Research Square · 30 Sep 2026 · Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed
- Relevance
- Core geroscience
- News value
- Important
- Evidence
- Humans
- Status
- Preprint
More on Aging clocks
See allBiological age uncertainty independently predicts mortality and health decline in humans
Researchers derived biological age uncertainty across UK Biobank participants, finding that higher uncertainty reflects reduced physiological coherence and predicts worse health outcomes.
medRxiv · Li Y et al.
Retinal imaging model predicts age and reveals sex differences in human aging
The retinal age gap correlates with mortality, disease risks, and sex-specific genetic pathways in more than 71,000 UK Biobank participants.
Nature communications · Trofimova O et al.
Blood cell composition explains substantial variation in DNA methylation age
Cell counts explain less variation in age acceleration and only modestly affect its links to mortality and 176 incident health outcomes.
Genome medicine · Jonkman TH et al.
Kidney tubular epithelial cells drive accelerated epigenetic aging in disease
A cross-species single-cell atlas links injured human kidney cells and aged mouse kidneys to shared chromatin reorganization and impaired repair.
Nature aging · Jeong H et al.
Chronological age prediction does not prove biological age measurement
Researchers show that standard age-trained clocks reflect task-specific statistics rather than true biological aging constructs, limiting how researchers interpret clock gaps and rejuvenation.
bioRxiv · Song S et al.