Frontiers in Public Health

Childhood meat intake linked to better late-life thinking

Participants reporting almost daily childhood meat consumption scored 1.13 points higher on a later-life cognitive test than those reporting none or about once yearly.

Paper by Zhihao Chai, Rao Dai, Baijing Zhou, 5 more authorsWei Zhang · Twelfth Guangzhou City People's Hospital
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.Participant flow diagram.Chai et al.
Cross-sectional study of 8,865 middle-aged and older adults in GuangzhouPopulations

Limit: Unmeasured childhood household wealth could explain the link between meat intake and thinking scores

Edited by Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow

In an observational study, 8,865 people aged 50 and older with Guangzhou household registration reported how often they ate meat in childhood. Researchers assessed their thinking and memory with cognitive tests.

After accounting for sex, age and parental literacy, participants reporting almost daily childhood meat consumption scored 1.13 points higher on the Mini-Mental State Examination, a test of thinking skills, than those reporting none or about once a year. They also had lower odds of mild cognitive impairment, a mild decline in thinking or memory. The associations were stronger among participants with literate parents. A statistical analysis found that adult education accounted for 40% of the association between childhood meat consumption and scores on this test.

Why it matters

The authors suggest that improving early-life nutrition and educational attainment may help delay or prevent cognitive impairment in later adulthood.

Caveats

This observational analysis cannot show cause and effect, and participants self-reported their childhood diet. The findings may not apply to populations outside adults aged 50 and older with Guangzhou household registration.

From the paper

Participants

Among the 8,865 participants, 131 (1.5%) were identified as potential outliers and 59 (0.7%) as high-leverage points.

Results, 3.2 CMC and overall cognitive function

Result

Participants whose parents were literate showed a significant association of CMC with lower odds of MCI ( OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38–0.54), but those whose parents were illiterate showed no significant association ( OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65–1.17).

Results, 3.4 Effect modification by parental literacy

Quoted word for word from the full text on frontiersin.org.