GeroScience

Personalized phone advice showed limited benefit in older adults

The hazard ratio for death—a comparison of death rates over time—was 0.66 for personalized versus general advice, with no clear difference.

Figure 1 from GeroScience
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Váncsa et al.
Randomized trial in 441 older adults, median 937 days, against adults receiving general phone adviceInterventions

Registered NCT04321928

Limit: Self-reported lifestyle changes were vulnerable to reporting bias

Follow

A randomized trial in Hungary analyzed 441 adults aged 60 or older who received either general or personalized lifestyle advice by telephone. The advice covered mental health, smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol use. Researchers assessed deaths from any cause instead of the planned combined measure of COVID-19 severity because of infection rates.

Personalized advice did not clearly reduce deaths, and the uncertainty range included no difference. Several lifestyle behaviors improved over time, but personalization added little benefit. Among participants who drank alcohol at the outset, personalized advice led to a greater reduction in estimated consumption than general advice. However, body mass index, a weight-to-height measure, increased in the personalized group among participants with obesity.

Why it matters

Older adults face a higher risk of severe COVID-19. The trial addressed whether tailoring lifestyle support could improve health outcomes in this population during the pandemic.

Caveats

Participants knew their assigned group, and the mortality analysis differed from the planned COVID-19 severity outcome. The findings concern adults aged 60 or older during the pandemic in Hungary.

From the paper

Participants

A total of 441 participants were included in the study, with 214 assigned to group A (general) and 227 to group B (personalized).

Results, Participant selection

Result

Using a Cox proportional hazards model, the HR comparing arm B to arm A was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.28–1.53), favoring arm B; however, the result did not reach statistical significance.

Results, Survival analysis and COVID-19 infections during follow-up

Limitation

Several outcomes were self-reported, and COVID-19–specific mortality and potentially mild infections could not be reliably captured.

Strengths and limitations

Quoted word for word from the full text on link.springer.com.