Frontiers in Nutrition

EAT-Lancet diet linked to lower type 2 diabetes risk

People in the highest versus lowest quarters of two diet scores had lower relative diabetes risk, with hazard ratios of 0.83 and 0.85.

Paper by Yanxia Cui, Haijie Gao, Huijia Zhang et al.

A large platter of leafy vegetables, lentils, and grains sits beneath blue-green figures, beside a smaller dish and gray figures, with dark figures in both…
Accepted, not yet published: cohort study of 155,413 UK Biobank participants without type 2 diabetesPopulations

Limit: Diet assessment allowed one 24-hour recall, which can misrepresent usual eating patterns

Edited by Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow

Among 155,413 UK Biobank participants without type 2 diabetes at enrollment, an observational cohort study linked closer adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet with lower risk of developing the disease. Participants completed at least one survey recalling what they ate over 24 hours and had biological aging measures available.

Researchers used two scores to assess diet adherence and two measures to estimate biological aging. Higher diet scores were associated with less accelerated biological aging and lower diabetes risk. The highest versus lowest quarters of the Knuppel and Stubbendorff diet scores had hazard ratios of 0.83 and 0.85, respectively, indicating lower relative diabetes risk. Exploratory analyses suggested that biological aging measures statistically accounted for approximately 33%–44% of the diet–diabetes association.

Why it matters

The authors supported diabetes prevention strategies that promote healthy dietary patterns and address accelerated biological aging.

Caveats

The observational design could not establish that the diet reduced diabetes risk or that slower biological aging explained the link. The findings concern people initially without type 2 diabetes; the abstract does not report their ages or follow-up duration.

Where the evidence stands

Eat-lancet diet

  • 14 independent labs in 6 countries
  • 1 finding against
  • Funders: National Natural Science Foundation of China and others
  • 7 of 41 findings with company ties