AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 Abstract

Scan-based heart age linked to higher one-year cardiac risk

Over one year, cardiac events occurred in 20.5% of patients whose scan-based heart age exceeded their actual age by at least two years, versus 5.5% otherwise.

Paper by Vivek Singh, Mehmet Gulsun, Josephine Lira, +7 more authorsHimanshu Gupta · Siemens Healthineers · The Valley Hosp
A branching coronary artery narrowed by thick deposits sits among smaller artery sections with either wide openings or plaque-constricted passages.

Our read

Biomarkers
Studied:
Cohort study of 1,672 people undergoing coronary CT angiography, against non-accelerated aging (Independent replication, multicenter)
What changed:
Major cardiac events were higher with accelerated cardiovascular aging: 20.5% against 5.5% with non-accelerated aging
Why it’s aging research:
It builds or tests a tool for aging research.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

People undergoing coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, a scan of the heart’s arteries, were studied in an observational analysis. Researchers developed an artificial intelligence model in 7,843 people and tested it in an independent group of 1,672 followed for one year. It estimated cardiovascular age from five scan measurements of heart structure, calcium-containing artery deposits and artery narrowing. Researchers corrected the gap between estimated and actual age for bias, then classified a gap of at least two years as accelerated cardiovascular aging.

Major heart-related events occurred in 20.5% of the test group with accelerated aging, versus 5.5% without it. The model distinguished risk better than an artery-age measure based on calcium deposits. Event rates were 23.5% when both measures were elevated and 3.0% when neither was elevated.

Why it matters

Age in years does not fully reflect cardiovascular aging. The authors suggest that scans already used in care may help identify patients at high short-term cardiac risk.

Caveats

The analysis tested prediction over one year, not whether care guided by the score improved outcomes. The conference abstract did not describe participants’ ages or health profiles, limiting how clearly the findings apply to other patients.

Comments

Be the first to comment.