The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging

Unstable-surface strength training aided some thinking skills

At 24 weeks, training improved verbal fluency by 1.2 letters and forward digit recall by 0.7 points compared with low-intensity exercise.

Figure 1 from The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. da Silva et al., CC BY
Studied:
Randomized trial in 162 older adults with probable mild cognitive impairment, 24 weeks (Blinded, sham-controlled, registered RBR-9bv3dc9)
What changed:
Verbal fluency improved by 1.2 letters with unstable-surface strength training compared with low-intensity exercise
The catch:
Follow-up lasted only 24 weeks, limiting assessment of lasting gains
In the record:
One of 5 papers on instability resistance training on record: 5 with results in people.
Why it’s aging research:
It studies an intervention with evidence of extending healthy life.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

Physically independent adults aged 65 or older with probable mild cognitive impairment took part in a randomized trial involving 162 people. Their average age was 70.4 years. Researchers assigned 80 participants to twice-weekly strength training on unstable surfaces for 24 weeks. They performed seven exercises, each in three sets of 10–15 repetitions. The other 82 participants performed low-intensity functional exercises, stretching and relaxation without progression.

Assessors who measured cognition did not know participants’ group assignments. At 24 weeks, the strength-training group performed better on two tests of executive function, the mental skills used to manage tasks: letter-based verbal fluency and recalling digits in order. The remaining cognitive outcomes, including memory, did not differ significantly between groups.

Why it matters

Probable mild cognitive impairment raises the question of which thinking skills remain responsive to exercise in older age.

Caveats

Follow-up lasted 24 weeks, leaving the durability of the gains unclear. Participants were physically independent and had probable mild cognitive impairment, rather than representing older adults generally.

Comments

Be the first to comment.