Facial emotion recognition training

Facial emotion recognition training improves disgust recognition accuracy with static stimuli in humans.

“only for disgust (F2,40 = 5.748; p = 0.006; η2p = 0.223), with improvement following FER training compared to baseline (p = 0.005).”

Human trialCognitively unimpaired older adults without indications of depression; compared to baselineMatching-to-Sample procedure on a portable touchscreen computerone sessionn = 22

Effects of a single-session facial emotion recognition training using the MTS paradigm in cognitively unimpaired older adults

Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy·1 Jan 2025

Facial emotion recognition training improves happiness recognition accuracy with dynamic stimuli in humans.

“ANOVA showed improved recognition of happiness (F2,40 = 7.732; p = 0.001; η2p = 0.279) following FER training compared to control training.”

Human trialCognitively unimpaired older adults without indications of depression; compared to control trainingMatching-to-Sample procedure on a portable touchscreen computerone sessionn = 22

Effects of a single-session facial emotion recognition training using the MTS paradigm in cognitively unimpaired older adults

Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy·1 Jan 2025

Facial emotion recognition training improves overall facial emotion recognition accuracy with dynamic stimuli in humans.

“Bonferroni post hoc analysis indicated improvement following FER training compared to baseline (p = 0.004).”

Human trialCognitively unimpaired older adults without indications of depression; compared to baselineMatching-to-Sample procedure on a portable touchscreen computerone sessionn = 22

Effects of a single-session facial emotion recognition training using the MTS paradigm in cognitively unimpaired older adults

Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy·1 Jan 2025