Cephalomedullary nailing
Cephalomedullary nailing has been studied in 6 papers since 2017: 5 observational studies in people. The newest paper, Dec 30, 2022: “Preoperative Comorbidities Associated With Early Mortality in Hip Fracture Patients: A Multicenter Study”.
6 papers study it2 findingsUpdated
“there was no statistically significant difference between ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle thickness measurements or ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle stiffness measurements”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 2 independent labs in 1 country
- Humans5
What did studies of Cephalomedullary nailing find?
1Studies of Cephalomedullary nailing measured 1 outcome; the most studied are GM muscle thickness (1 study).
GM muscle thickness
no changein humans1
1 study
GM muscle thickness
no changein humans1
Cephalomedullary nailing has no effect on GM muscle thickness in humans.
“there was no statistically significant difference between ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle thickness measurements or ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle stiffness measurements”
Humanstrochanteric fractures treated with PFN-Agluteus medius musclepost-operative sixth week or latern = 40
International orthopaedics
What is Cephalomedullary nailing linked with?
1Studies link Cephalomedullary nailing with 1 measure, most often hip abduction strength (1 study).
Hip abduction strength
downin humans1
1 study
Hip abduction strength
downin humans1
Cephalomedullary nailing is associated with hip abduction strength in humans (At 0 degrees: 7.7±3.5 versus 6.2±2.8 kg; at 10 degrees: 5.5±2.0 versus 4.2±2.0 kg, non-operative versus operative side).
“abduction strength at 0 degrees 7.7±3.5/6.2±2.8 (p=0.002), abduction strength at 10 degrees 5.5±2.0/4.2±2.0 (p=0.001).”
HumansFemoral intertrochanteric fractures; operative versus non-operative sidehip musclen = 20
The open orthopaedics journal