Cephalomedullary nailing

Cephalomedullary nailing has been studied in 6 papers since 2017: 5 observational studies in people. The newest paper, Dec 30, 2022: “Preoperative Comorbidities Associated With Early Mortality in Hip Fracture Patients: A Multicenter Study”.

Exposure

6 papers study it2 findingsUpdated

See all 6

“there was no statistically significant difference between ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle thickness measurements or ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle stiffness measurements”
Iatrogenic gluteus medius muscle insertion injury while trochanteric entry nailing due to trochanteric fractures: a comparative study in forty patients with gray-scale ultrasound and shear-wave elastographyInternational orthopaedics2021doi:10.1007/s00264-021-05177-0

None of its findings points the other way.

  • 2 independent labs in 1 country
  • Humans5

What did studies of Cephalomedullary nailing find?

1

Studies of Cephalomedullary nailing measured 1 outcome; the most studied are GM muscle thickness (1 study).

GM muscle thickness

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Cephalomedullary nailing has no effect on GM muscle thickness in humans.

    “there was no statistically significant difference between ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle thickness measurements or ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle stiffness measurements”

    Humanstrochanteric fractures treated with PFN-Agluteus medius musclepost-operative sixth week or latern = 40

    Iatrogenic gluteus medius muscle insertion injury while trochanteric entry nailing due to trochanteric fractures: a comparative study in forty patients with gray-scale ultrasound and shear-wave elastography

    International orthopaedics

More on GM muscle thickness

What is Cephalomedullary nailing linked with?

1

Studies link Cephalomedullary nailing with 1 measure, most often hip abduction strength (1 study).

Hip abduction strength

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Cephalomedullary nailing is associated with hip abduction strength in humans (At 0 degrees: 7.7±3.5 versus 6.2±2.8 kg; at 10 degrees: 5.5±2.0 versus 4.2±2.0 kg, non-operative versus operative side).

    “abduction strength at 0 degrees 7.7±3.5/6.2±2.8 (p=0.002), abduction strength at 10 degrees 5.5±2.0/4.2±2.0 (p=0.001).”

    HumansFemoral intertrochanteric fractures; operative versus non-operative sidehip musclen = 20

    Comparison of Post-Operative Muscular Strength Between Gamma Nailing and Hemiarthroplasty System in Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures

    The open orthopaedics journal

Latest