Progression to sustained mild cognitive impairment

Disease

1 paper studies it2 findings

  • Humans1

Associations

2

Driving-trajectory markers

upin humans1HR 6.02

1 study
  1. Driving-trajectory markers predict progression to sustained mild cognitive impairment in humans (HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.35–15.41).

    “Driving markers stratified risk at 12 months (HR = 6.02, 95%CI: 2.35-15.41) and 24 months (HR = 13.38, 95%CI: 3.03-59.04).”

    Humanslandmark survival analysis12 months

    Driving changes linked to later cognitive decline in older adults

    The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences

More on Driving-trajectory markers

Driving-trajectory prediction model

upin humans1

1 study
  1. driving-trajectory prediction model predicts progression to sustained mild cognitive impairment in humans (AUC 0.752 (95% CI 0.627–0.863); 76% sensitivity; 75% specificity; 18-month median lead time).

    “The model detected 19/25 progressors (AUC=0.752, 95%CI: 0.627-0.863; 76% sensitivity; 75% specificity) with an 18-month median lead time before sustained CDR conversion.”

    Humansinitially cognitively normaln = 298

    Driving changes linked to later cognitive decline in older adults

    The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences

Latest

Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 11 paper in 12 months
The Journals of Gerontology, Series B

Driving changes linked to later cognitive decline in older adults

A driving-based model detected 19 of 25 older adults who developed sustained mild cognitive impairment, with a median lead time of 18 months.A driving-based model detected 19 of 25 older adults who developed sustained mild cognitive impairment, with a median lead time of 18 months.

Cohort · 298 peopleBiomarkers