Wearable rhythm monitoring
Wearable rhythm monitoring has been studied in 1 paper since 2026: none in people yet, 1 review; 1 in the past year. No study of it in people or animals has been published yet. The newest paper, Oct 16, 2026: “Do We Still Need Conventional Holter ECGs in the Era of Smart Devices?”.
1 paper studies it1 findingUpdated
1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 1 papers on wearable rhythm monitoring
What did studies of wearable rhythm monitoring find?
1Studies of wearable rhythm monitoring measured one outcome, Atrial fibrillation detection.
Atrial fibrillation detection
upin humans1
1 study
Atrial fibrillation detection
upin humans1
Wearable rhythm monitoring increases atrial fibrillation detection in humans (systematic screening compared with standard diagnostic pathways).
“Systematic screening approaches using wearables have demonstrated higher AF detection rates compared with standard diagnostic pathways”
Reviewsystematic screening compared with standard diagnostic pathways
Do We Still Need Conventional Holter ECGs in the Era of Smart Devices?
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine