Repeated testing
Repeated testing has been studied in 2 papers since 2023: 2 observational studies in people. The newest paper, Nov 24, 2024: “Remote physical function testing in older adults: a mixed methods study exploring test reliability, feasibility, and perceptions of participants and assessors. (Preprint)”.
2 papers study it1 findingUpdated
“Test-retest reliability ranged from poor (ICC < 0.5; single-leg balance) to good (ICC 0.75–0.9; 5-STS, 30-STS, 2.44 m gait usual, 4 m gait fast, and FSST) but improved with repeated testing.”
- 1 lab
- Humans2
What did studies of Repeated testing find?
1Studies of Repeated testing measured 1 outcome; the most studied are test-retest reliability (1 study).
Test-retest reliability
upin humans1
1 study
Test-retest reliability
upin humans1
Repeated testing improves test-retest reliability in humans (ICC < 0.5 to 0.75–0.9).
“Test-retest reliability ranged from poor (ICC < 0.5; single-leg balance) to good (ICC 0.75–0.9; 5-STS, 30-STS, 2.44 m gait usual, 4 m gait fast, and FSST) but improved with repeated testing.”
Human trialremotely at home3 videoconferencing sessions approximately one week apartn = 19
Preprint
Latest
BMC Geriatrics
Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition in people with dementia
Cohort study of 56 peopleDementia