Operative treatment

Operative treatment has been studied in 7 papers since 2017: 2 trials and 5 observational studies in people. The newest paper, Oct 11, 2025: “Mortality from tibial shaft fractures in the elderly (MTFE)-a multicentre study of management outcomes”.

Intervention

7 papers study it12 findingsUpdated

See all 7

“The Barthel index (= 0.325), VAS (p = 0.711), quality of life (p = 0.824), and Tinetti-Gait Test (p = 0.913) showed no significant differences between the two groups after 12 months.”
Conservative versus operative treatment of FFP II fractures in a geriatric cohort: a prospective randomized pilot trialScientific reports2023doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43249-w

2 of its findings point the other way.

  • 3 independent labs in 2 countries
  • 2 findings against
  • Funder: Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Human trial2
  • Humans5

Studies in people

2 studies gave operative treatment to people and measured what changed.

What did studies of Operative treatment find?

4

Studies of Operative treatment measured 4 outcomes; the most studied are physical function (2 studies), mortality (2) and pain (2).

Physical function

no changein humans2

2 studies
  1. Operative treatment has no effect on physical function in humans.

    “After 12 months, there were no significant differences in the Barthel index (p = 0.3), VAS pain (p = 0.7), quality of life (p = 0.8), and Tinetti–Gait Test (p = 0.9).”

    Human trialcompared to conservative treatment12.9 monthsn = 39

    Conservative versus operative treatment of FFP II fractures in a geriatric cohort: a prospective randomized pilot trial

    Scientific reports

  2. Operative treatment has no effect on physical function in humans (p = 0.325 for Barthel index, p = 0.711 for VAS, p = 0.824 for quality of life, p = 0.913 for Tinetti-Gait Test).

    “The Barthel index (= 0.325), VAS (p = 0.711), quality of life (p = 0.824), and Tinetti-Gait Test (p = 0.913) showed no significant differences between the two groups after 12 months.”

    Human trialfragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFP II)12 monthsn = 39

    Conservative versus operative treatment of FFP II fractures in a geriatric cohort: a prospective randomized pilot trial

    Scientific reports

  3. Operative treatment has no effect on physical function in humans.

    “No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in HRQoL (p = 0.43), function (p = 0.78) and pain (p = 0.19).”

    Humansdisplaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture; compared with nonoperative treatment1–10 years

    Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

Mortality

no changein humans1downin humans1

2 studies
  1. Operative treatment has no effect on mortality in humans.

    “Nevertheless, no significant difference between the ST and CCT group survival rates was observed (Log Rank Chi2 = 1.842, p = 0.2; Fig. ).”

    Human trialcompared to conservative treatment12.9 monthsn = 39

    Conservative versus operative treatment of FFP II fractures in a geriatric cohort: a prospective randomized pilot trial

    Scientific reports

  2. Operative treatment has no effect on mortality in humans (p = 0.175).

    “The one-year mortality rate showed no significant difference (p = 0.175).”

    Human trialfragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFP II)12 monthsn = 39

    Conservative versus operative treatment of FFP II fractures in a geriatric cohort: a prospective randomized pilot trial

    Scientific reports

  3. Operative treatment decreases mortality in humans (90.7% vs 74.7% (p=.023)).

    “The survival of the operative treatment group was 90.7% (49/54) and significantly higher than the survival of the conservative treatment group (74.7%; 56/75; p=.023).”

    Humansfragility fractures of the pelvisone year

    Midterm follow-up of elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis: A prospective cohort-study comparing operative and non-operative treatment according to a therapeutic algorithm

    Injury

Pain

upin humans1no changein humans1

2 studies
  1. Operative treatment increases pain in humans (significantly higher mean).

    “The one-year follow up showed a high dispersion of the pain level in the operatively treated patients and a significantly higher mean in comparison to conservatively treated patients.”

    Humansfragility fractures of the pelvisone year

    Midterm follow-up of elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis: A prospective cohort-study comparing operative and non-operative treatment according to a therapeutic algorithm

    Injury

  2. Operative treatment has no effect on pain in humans.

    “No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in HRQoL (p = 0.43), function (p = 0.78) and pain (p = 0.19).”

    Humansdisplaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture; compared with nonoperative treatment1–10 years

    Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

Health-related quality of life

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Operative treatment has no effect on health-related quality of life in humans.

    “No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in HRQoL (p = 0.43), function (p = 0.78) and pain (p = 0.19).”

    Humansdisplaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture; compared with nonoperative treatment1–10 years

    Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

What is Operative treatment linked with?

3

Studies link Operative treatment with 3 measures, most often complications (1 study), reinterventions (1) and social participation (1).

Complications

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Operative treatment raises the risk of complications in humans (31.0% vs 14.9% (p=.04)).

    “Overall in 31.0% (18/58) of the operative participants and in 14.9% (14/93) of the non-operatively treated participants complications occurred (p=.04).”

    Humansfragility fractures of the pelvisone yearn = 151

    Midterm follow-up of elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis: A prospective cohort-study comparing operative and non-operative treatment according to a therapeutic algorithm

    Injury

Reinterventions

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Operative treatment is associated with reinterventions in humans (8 versus 2 reinterventions; p = 0.08).

    “More complications and reinterventions occurred in the operative group than the nonoperative group”

    Humansdisplaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture; compared with nonoperative treatment1–10 years

    Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

Social participation

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Operative treatment is associated with social participation in humans (Nonsignificant trend; p = 0.09).

    “A trend toward better social participation in the operative group (p = 0.09) was found.”

    Humansdisplaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture; compared with nonoperative treatment1–10 years

    Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

Latest