Montoye actigraphy algorithm
Montoye actigraphy algorithm has been studied in 1 paper since 2026: 1 observational study in people; 1 in the past year. The newest paper, Jun 5, 2026: “Comparing Self-Reported and Actigraphy-Derived Physical Activity: Results from the Bringing the Diabetes Prevention Program to Geriatric Populations (BRIDGE) Study”.
1 paper studies it1 findingUpdated
See all 1 papers on montoye actigraphy algorithm
At a glance
The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 1 lab.
“There was no difference between self-reported and Montoye MVPA (−11 minutes/day; 95% CI: −30 to 8; P=0.49).”
Humans: a single group. Cells, worms or flies and mice: nothing yet.
- 1 lab
- Humans1
What did studies of montoye actigraphy algorithm find?
1Studies of montoye actigraphy algorithm measured one outcome, self-reported MVPA.
Self-reported MVPA
no changein humans1
1 study
Self-reported MVPA
no changein humans1
Montoye actigraphy algorithm was not clearly linked with self-reported MVPA in humans (-11 minutes/day (95% CI: -30 to 8)).
“There was no difference between self-reported and Montoye MVPA (−11 minutes/day; 95% CI: −30 to 8; P=0.49).”
Humansn = 39
ADA Scientific Sessions 2026 abstract
Latest
1 paper in 12 monthsADA Scientific Sessions 2026 Abstract
Comparing Self-Reported and Actigraphy-Derived Physical Activity: Results from the Bringing the Diabetes Prevention Program to Geriatric Populations (BRIDGE) Study
Cross-sectional study of 39 peoplePopulations