Direct lateral approach
Direct lateral approach has been studied in 3 papers since 2019: 2 trials and 1 observational study in people. The newest paper, Apr 10, 2025: “Functional outcomes and complication rates of the SPAIRE approach compared to the direct lateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures”.
3 papers study it1 findingUpdated
See all 3 papers on direct lateral approach
At a glance
The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 1 lab in 1 country.
“A total of 11 patients in the direct lateral group had a positive Trendelenburg test at one year compared with one patient in the anterolateral group (11/55 (20%) vs 1/55 (1.8%), relative risk (RR) 11.1; p = 0.004).”
- 1 lab in 1 country
- Funder: Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
- Human trial2
- Humans1
What did studies of direct lateral approach find?
1Studies of direct lateral approach measured one outcome, positive Trendelenburg test.
Positive Trendelenburg test
upin humans1RR 11.1
1 study
Positive Trendelenburg test
upin humans1RR 11.1
Direct lateral approach increases positive Trendelenburg test in humans (compared with anterolateral approach; hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture) (11/55 (20%) vs 1/55 (1.8%), RR 11.1; p = 0.004).
“A total of 11 patients in the direct lateral group had a positive Trendelenburg test at one year compared with one patient in the anterolateral group (11/55 (20%) vs 1/55 (1.8%), relative risk (RR) 11.1; p = 0.004).”
Human trialcompared with anterolateral approach; hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracturehipone year follow-up
The bone & joint journal