Stance-time variability

Biomarker

3 papers study it2 findings

2 new papers in 30 daysSee all 3

Human trial1
Humans2

Associations

Montreal Cognitive Assessment score

upin humans1

1 study

Stance-time variability is associated with montreal Cognitive Assessment score in humans (Partial r=0.38).
“Stance-time and double-support-time variability had the strongest covariate-adjusted correlations (partial r=0.38 and 0.34), although no covariate-adjusted correlation survived correction.”
HumansCovariate-adjusted analysis; no adjusted correlation survived correctionn = 50
Explainable machine learning for Montreal Cognitive Assessment score estimation from gait in community-dwelling older adults: An exploratory evaluation
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)Oct 18, 2026

Type 2 diabetes

upin humans1

1 study

Stance-time variability predicts type 2 diabetes in humans (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI 0.727-0.898, p < 0.001, sensitivity 94.6%).
“stance time variability had good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.813, 95% CI 0.727-0.898, p < 0.001, sensitivity 94.6%)”
Humans
Gait variability as a dual-pathway marker of cognitive-motor dysfunction in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Frontiers in endocrinologyMar 31, 2026

Latest

3 papers in 12 months

Age and AgeingOct 23

Added training showed no walking-skill edge in older adults

A randomized trial of 249 adults aged 65 or older found no differences between standard exercise and a 12-week program adding timing and coordination exercises.A randomized trial of 249 adults aged 65 or older found no differences between standard exercise and a 12-week program adding timing and coordination exercises.

Randomized trial · 249 peopleInterventions