There are 3 papers on International Early Warning Score in aging research: 3 observational studies in people.
3 papers study it1 finding
See all 3 papers on International Early Warning Score
“Overall, the IEWS performed significantly better than NEWS with an area under the receiving operating characteristic of 0.89 (95% CIs, 0.89-0.90) versus 0.82 (0.82-0.83) in the NEED”
- Humans3
Effects
1In-hospital mortality prediction
upin humans1
1 study
In-hospital mortality prediction
upin humans1
International Early Warning Score is linked with better in-hospital mortality prediction in humans (AUC 0.89 (95% CIs, 0.89-0.90) vs 0.82 (0.82-0.83)).
“Overall, the IEWS performed significantly better than NEWS with an area under the receiving operating characteristic of 0.89 (95% CIs, 0.89-0.90) versus 0.82 (0.82-0.83) in the NEED”
Humans
Critical care medicine
Latest
1 paper in 12 monthsJAMA Network Open
Early Warning Scores in Emergency Department Patients Aged 80 Years or Older
Cohort study of 50,645 peopleBiomarkers
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Updating the International Early Warning Score with frailty and comparing to gestalt for prediction of 3-day critical illness and mortality in emergency department patients
Cohort study of 774 peopleFrailty
Critical Care Medicine
Development and External Validation of the International Early Warning Score for Improved Age- and Sex-Adjusted In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in the Emergency Department
Cohort study of 95,553 peopleBiomarkers