bioRxiv

Memory task scores linked to Alzheimer’s markers in older adults

An observational study of 46 cognitively normal older adults and 41 with memory-related mild cognitive impairment linked object-memory scores to Alzheimer’s blood markers.

Figure 1. Boxplot of LDI grouped by sex and clinical diagnosis.
Open the figure at full size
Figure 1. Boxplot of LDI grouped by sex and clinical diagnosis.Boxplot of LDI grouped by sex and clinical diagnosis.Yang et al.

Our read

Biomarkers
Studied:
Preprint: cross-sectional study of older adults with or without amnestic MCI
What changed:
Memory task scores were lower in older adults with higher blood pTau217 levels
The catch:
Amyloid and tau PET data were missing, limiting direct verification of Alzheimer’s pathology
In the record:
The 46th paper on pTau217 with results in people; 83 on record in all.
Why it’s aging research:
Biological age, frailty, function, multimorbidity or death.

Editor of record: Boris Djordjevic · AgingResearch.News

Follow @agingbrief

Forty-six cognitively normal older adults and 41 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, which affects memory, completed an object-memory task in this observational study. They judged whether objects were the same as, similar to or different from ones seen earlier during three 13-minute sessions in one visit. Researchers also measured blood markers and the volume of the hippocampus, a brain region involved in memory.

Participants with memory impairment scored lower. Smaller hippocampal volume and higher blood levels of phosphorylated tau 217, a chemically modified protein measured as an Alzheimer’s marker, had the strongest links to poorer scores. The task distinguished the groups with performance comparable to established Alzheimer’s markers. Older age was linked to poorer discrimination only for objects with little resemblance to previously seen ones, regardless of diagnosis.

Why it matters

The work addresses whether memory testing can complement blood tests and brain scans in identifying cognitive impairment in older adults.

Caveats

This cross-sectional study cannot establish cause or predict future decline, and classification performance was assessed within the same sample. The preprint has not been peer-reviewed, and its findings exclude people unable to complete task training or provide usable brain scans.

From the paper

Result

In the stepwise logistic regression analysis, stepwise AIC selection identified a combined model including LDI (β = -1.157, 95%CI [-2.247, -0.067])), pTau181 (β = -0.995, 95%CI [-2.465, 0.474]), pTau217 (β = 2.453, [0.786, 4.121]), and hippocampal volume (β = -0.313, [-1.187, 0.561]).

Results, LDI in Diagnosis Classification

Limitation

First, the cross–sectional design precludes causal inferences regarding the temporal relationships among mnemonic discrimination decline, biomarker changes, and hippocampal atrophy.

Limitations and future directions

Quoted word for word from the full text on bioRxiv.

Comments

Be the first to comment.