American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Age differences in clitoral-vestibular bulb anatomy across the adult lifespan

Graphical abstract from American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Open the figure at full size
Graphical abstract. Bowen et al.
Cohort study of 134 peopleMechanisms

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is sparse normative data on clitoral-vestibular bulb anatomy and how it changes with aging, despite growing evidence of the latter playing a notable role in female sexual function and other pelvic symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To identify age-related differences in clitoral-vestibular bulb anatomy (dimensions, position, and shape) among women across the adult lifespan. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of pelvic magnetic resonance images of women (≥18 years) without pelvic floor disorder/dysfunction symptom indications (pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence/pain, fecal incontinence/pain, dyspareunia) and with normal pelvic anatomy (radiographically normal reproductive, genitourinary, or gastrointestinal systems). Participants were categorized into the following age groups: Young Adult (18-34 years), Early Midlife (35-49 years), and Older Adult (≥50 years). Axial images of participants in the supine position at rest were acquired for medical indications. The clitoral-vestibular bulb complex, vagina, and urethra were manually segmented to construct 3-dimensional anatomical models. Computational methods quantified clitoral-vestibular bulb dimensions, position, vaginal-urethral distances, and shape (given by principal component scores obtained from a statistical shape model). Age differences in clitoral-vestibular bulb measures were evaluated using Bonferroni-corrected one-way multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance, with adjustments for body mass index and parity. Age-related correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: A total of 134 women were analyzed (median [range] age, 39 [19-80] years): 47 young adult, 46 early midlife, and 41 older adult women. All young adult and early midlife women were premenopausal, whereas 27 (71%) of older adult women were postmenopausal. Older adult women had a shorter clitoral body length than early midlife women (24.1 mm vs 27.9 mm; P=.006). Overall, smaller vestibular bulb volume was associated with increasing age (P=.04). Older Adult women had a more caudally positioned (lower in the pelvis) clitoral-vestibular bulb complex than Early Midlife women (-21.0 mm vs -17.6 mm; P<.001) and Young Adult women (-21.0 mm vs -17.9 mm; P<.001). Across the entire cohort, increasing age correlated with a shorter clitoral body length (ρ=-0.21; P=.01), smaller vestibular bulb volume (ρ=-0.20; P=.02), and a more dorsally (ρ=-0.22; P=.01) and caudally (ρ=-0.43; P<.001) positioned clitoral-vestibular bulb complex, whereas clitoral volume remained unchanged (ρ=-0.03; P=.73). The shape analysis revealed that age predominantly affected the vestibular bulbs, which became more medially positioned (closer together) (ρ=-0.28; P=.001) and proportionally smaller relative to the clitoris (ρ=-0.28; P=.001) with advancing age. CONCLUSION: Increasing age was weakly correlated with reduced size and moderately correlated with caudal displacement of the clitoral-vestibular bulb complex, with aging primarily affecting the vestibular bulbs compared to the clitoris. Findings suggest age-related atrophy and descent of clitoral-vestibular bulb anatomy, which may contribute to sexual function and other pelvic symptoms.