Whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening

Whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening has been studied in 1 paper since 2026: none in people yet; 1 in the past year. No study of it in people or animals has been published yet. The newest story, Nov 13, 2026: “Blood DNA screen false positives rose with age”.

Exposure

1 paper studies it2 findingsUpdated

1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 1 papers on whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening

  • In silico1

What is whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening linked with?

2

Studies link whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening with 2 measures: Clinical net benefit and Positive predictive value.

Clinical net benefit

mixedin silico1

1 study
  1. Whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening is associated with clinical net benefit in silico (CHIP carriers versus unselected adults; assumed sensitivity 0.50) (At most 0.3 per 1,000 in unselected adults; up to 9.8 per 1,000 in CHIP carriers).

    “net benefit was near zero in unselected adults (at most 0.3 per 1,000) and positive in CHIP carriers (up to 9.8 per 1,000).”

    In silicoCHIP carriers versus unselected adults; assumed sensitivity 0.50

    Blood DNA screen false positives rose with age

    Research SquarePreprint

Positive predictive value

mixedin silico1

1 study
  1. Whole-blood DNA methylation burden screening predicts positive predictive value in silico (CHIP carriers versus unselected adults; assumed sensitivity 0.50) (1.8% in unselected adults; 9–29% in CHIP carriers; 54% with a repeat draw).

    “positive predictive value was 1.8% in unselected adults and 9–29% in CHIP carriers (54% with a repeat draw)”

    In silicoCHIP carriers versus unselected adults; assumed sensitivity 0.50whole blood

    Blood DNA screen false positives rose with age

    Research SquarePreprint

Latest

Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 0Nov 2026: 11 paper in 12 months
Research Square

Blood DNA screen false positives rose with age

False-positive rates rose from 0.3% below age 60 to 7.5% at 80 or older in an analysis of whole-blood samples.False-positive rates rose from 0.3% below age 60 to 7.5% at 80 or older in an analysis of whole-blood samples.

Preprint: cross-sectional studyBiomarkers