AgingResearch.NewsJoin free

Web-based lung cancer risk self-assessment tool

Intervention

1 paper2 findings

C, W, M, H: cells, worms or flies, mice, humans. Dark: independent labs found the same change there. Light: one lab or one study. Outline: nothing yet.

Labs are independent when their papers share no last author and no institution.

Against: findings that point the other way from most findings on the same outcome.

No results posted: trials that ended more than a year ago with no results on ClinicalTrials.gov and no paper in ARN’s record.

Company ties: findings with an author at a company, or from a paper whose competing-interests statement declares ties to one.

  • 1 lab in 1 country
  • Funders: Alberta Health Services and 1 more
  • Humans1

Associations

2

Re-categorization as ineligible for screening

upin humans1+3.7%

1 study

  1. Web-based lung cancer risk self-assessment tool is associated with re-categorization as ineligible for screening in humans (3.7%).

    Humanslung cancer screening self-referrals with PLCOm2012 risk score >= 1.5%n = 384

    Concordance of a Web-based Lung Cancer Risk Self-Assessment Tool With Nursing Risk Assessment

    CHEST pulmonary22 Jul 2025

Concordance between web entries and nurse assessments

upin humans1

1 study

  1. Web-based lung cancer risk self-assessment tool is associated with concordance between web entries and nurse assessments in humans (> 95%).

    Humanslung cancer screening self-referrals with PLCOm2012 risk score >= 1.5%n = 384

    Concordance of a Web-based Lung Cancer Risk Self-Assessment Tool With Nursing Risk Assessment

    CHEST pulmonary22 Jul 2025

Latest

Related