Walking handball

Walking handball has been studied in 1 paper since 2026: 1 trial in people; 1 in the past year. The newest paper, Mar 18, 2026: “Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball”.

Intervention

1 paper studies it5 findingsUpdated

See all 1 papers on walking handball

At a glance

The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 1 lab in 1 country.

“WH mean relative HR (67 ± 7%HRmax) was similar (p > 0.05) to SPBW (65 ± 7% HRmax) and BW (69 ± 7%HRmax)”
Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handballFrontiers in sports and active living2026doi:10.3389/fspor.2026.1784474

None of its findings points the other way.

Humans: a single group. Cells, worms or flies and mice: nothing yet.
  • 1 lab in 1 country
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • Human trial1

Studies in people

1 study gave walking handball to people and measured what changed.

What changedDesignPeopleSource

no change: Has no effect on heart rate67 ± 7%HRmax vs 65 ± 7% and 69 ± 7%

no change: Has no effect on blood lactate2.0-2.2 mmol·L−1

down: Decreases distance covered2,561 ± 405 m vs. 4,543 ± 429 m and 4,656 ± 383 m

Randomized trial22 peopleMen71 ± 4 yearsOlder adultsFrontiers in sports and active living, Mar 18, 2026

What did studies of walking handball find?

5

Studies of walking handball measured 5 outcomes; the most studied are fun score (1 study), Rating of Perceived Exertion (1) and distance covered (1).

Fun score

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Walking handball increases fun score in humans (vs. SPBW and BW) (7.5 ± 2.2 AU vs. 6.1 ± 2.4 AU and 5.8 ± 2.3 AU).

    “Conversely, fun scores were higher (p < 0.05) in WH (7.5 ± 2.2 AU) and RTH (8.3 ± 1.6 AU) vs. SPBW (6.1 ± 2.4 AU) and BW (5.8 ± 2.3 AU)”

    Human trialvs. SPBW and BW5v5 and 6v6 matches on a 40 × 20 m court3 × 15 min periodsmalesn = 22

    Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball

    Frontiers in sports and active living

More on Fun score

Rating of Perceived Exertion

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Walking handball decreases Rating of Perceived Exertion in humans (vs. SPBW, BW and RTH).

    “while all RPE scores were lower (p < 0.05) in WH vs. SPBW, BW and RTH.”

    Human trialvs. SPBW, BW and RTH5v5 and 6v6 matches on a 40 × 20 m court3 × 15 min periodsmalesn = 22

    Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball

    Frontiers in sports and active living

More on Rating of Perceived Exertion

Distance covered

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Walking handball decreases distance covered in humans (versus self-paced brisk walking and brisk walking) (2,561 ± 405 m vs. 4,543 ± 429 m and 4,656 ± 383 m).

    “Distance covered was higher (p < 0.05) in SPBW (4,543 ± 429 m) and BW (4,656 ± 383 m) vs. WH (2,561 ± 405 m)”

    Human trialversus self-paced brisk walking and brisk walking5v5 and 6v6 matches on a 40 × 20 m court3 × 15 min periodsmalesn = 22

    Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball

    Frontiers in sports and active living

Blood lactate

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Walking handball showed no clear effect on blood lactate in humans (compared with conventional walking modalities) (2.0-2.2 mmol·L−1).

    “Likewise, RTH blood lactate was higher (3.5 ± 1.6 mmol·L−1, p < 0.05) than all walking modalities, with no differences between them (2.0-2.2 mmol·L−1, p > 0.05).”

    Human trialcompared with conventional walking modalities5v5 and 6v6 matches on a 40 × 20 m court3 × 15 min periodsmalesn = 22

    Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball

    Frontiers in sports and active living

More on Blood lactate

Heart rate

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Walking handball showed no clear effect on heart rate in humans (compared with brisk walking modalities) (67 ± 7%HRmax vs 65 ± 7% and 69 ± 7%).

    “WH mean relative HR (67 ± 7%HRmax) was similar (p > 0.05) to SPBW (65 ± 7% HRmax) and BW (69 ± 7%HRmax)”

    Human trialcompared with brisk walking modalities5v5 and 6v6 matches on a 40 × 20 m court3 × 15 min periodsmalesn = 22

    Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball

    Frontiers in sports and active living

More on Heart rate

Latest

Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 1Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 0Nov 2026: 01 paper in 12 months