Self-sampling
Intervention1 paper1 finding
C · W · M · H: cells, worms or flies, mice, humans. Dark: independent labs found the same change there. Light: one lab or one study. Outline: nothing yet.
Labs are independent when their papers share no last author and no institution.
Against: findings that point the other way from most findings on the same outcome.
No results posted: trials that ended more than a year ago with no results on ClinicalTrials.gov and no paper in ARN’s record.
Company ties: findings with an author at a company, or from a paper whose competing-interests statement declares ties to one.
Funders: National Cancer Institute and 1 more
Outcomes
1Screening uptake
upin humans1
1 study
Screening uptake
upin humans1
Self-sampling improves screening uptake in humans.
Reviewamong non-attendersfemales
Cost-effectiveness of self-sampling strategies for cervical cancer screening: a commentary · British journal of community nursing · 5 Oct 2026
Funding
National Cancer InstituteUS$1.9mNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchUS$677.3k4 grants since 2022
National Cancer InstituteNorthwestern UniversityUS$123.7k2022–2027
Improving the cancer screening process: Impact of self-sampling tools among underscreened patients
National Cancer InstitutePennsylvania State Univ Hershey Med CtrUS$639.5k2026–2031
Self-sampling to Optimize Anal Lesion Outcomes (SOLO)
National Cancer InstituteMedical College of WisconsinUS$651.8k2025–2030
HPV-related Oropharyngeal Cancer Screening and Monitoring through Remote Self-Sampling
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchBaylor College of MedicineUS$677.3k2024–2029