Self-sampling

Intervention1 paper1 finding

C · W · M · H: cells, worms or flies, mice, humans. Dark: independent labs found the same change there. Light: one lab or one study. Outline: nothing yet.

Labs are independent when their papers share no last author and no institution.

Against: findings that point the other way from most findings on the same outcome.

No results posted: trials that ended more than a year ago with no results on ClinicalTrials.gov and no paper in ARN’s record.

Company ties: findings with an author at a company, or from a paper whose competing-interests statement declares ties to one.

Funders: National Cancer Institute and 1 more

Outcomes

1

Screening uptake

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Self-sampling improves screening uptake in humans.

    Reviewamong non-attendersfemales

    Cost-effectiveness of self-sampling strategies for cervical cancer screening: a commentary · British journal of community nursing · 5 Oct 2026

Funding

National Cancer InstituteUS$1.9mNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchUS$677.3k4 grants since 2022

Latest

Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 11