Rhythmic auditory cues

Rhythmic auditory cues has been studied in 1 paper since 2016: 1 observational study in people. The newest paper, Aug 17, 2016: “Effect of dual tasks on gait variability in walking to auditory cues in older and young individuals”.

Intervention

1 paper studies it2 findingsUpdated

“synchronizing stepping to rhythmic auditory cues increase stride time variability but not the variability of minimum foot clearance in healthy older adults.”
Effect of dual tasks on gait variability in walking to auditory cues in older and young individualsExperimental brain research2016doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4754-x
  • 1 lab in 1 country
  • Funder: Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
  • Humans1

What did studies of Rhythmic auditory cues find?

2

Studies of Rhythmic auditory cues measured 2 outcomes; the most studied are minimum foot clearance variability (1 study) and stride time variability (1).

Minimum foot clearance variability

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Rhythmic auditory cues have no effect on minimum foot clearance variability in humans.

    “synchronizing stepping to rhythmic auditory cues increase stride time variability but not the variability of minimum foot clearance in healthy older adults.”

    Human trialhealthy older adults walking with synchronized steppingn = 20

    Effect of dual tasks on gait variability in walking to auditory cues in older and young individuals

    Experimental brain research

Stride time variability

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Rhythmic auditory cues increase stride time variability in humans.

    “synchronizing stepping to rhythmic auditory cues increase stride time variability but not the variability of minimum foot clearance in healthy older adults.”

    Human trialhealthy older adults walking with synchronized steppingn = 20

    Effect of dual tasks on gait variability in walking to auditory cues in older and young individuals

    Experimental brain research

Latest