Remote physical function testing

Remote physical function testing has been studied in 1 paper since 2025: 1 observational study in people. The newest paper, Sep 19, 2025: “Remote physical function testing in older adults: a mixed methods study exploring test reliability, feasibility, and perceptions of participants and assessors”.

Intervention

1 paper studies it1 findingUpdated

See all 1

“Test-retest reliability ranged from poor (ICC < 0.5 for single-leg balance) to good (ICC 0.75-0.9 for 5-STS, 30-STS, gait, and FSST), improving with repeated testing.”
Remote physical function testing in older adults: a mixed methods study exploring test reliability, feasibility, and perceptions of participants and assessorsPloS one2025doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332691
  • 1 lab in 1 country
  • Funders: Deakin University and 1 more
  • Humans1

What is Remote physical function testing linked with?

1

Studies link Remote physical function testing with 1 measure, most often Physical function test reliability (1 study).

Physical function test reliability

mixedin humans1

1 study
  1. Remote physical function testing is associated with physical function test reliability in humans (ICC < 0.5 for single-leg balance; ICC 0.75–0.9 for 5-STS, 30-STS, gait, and FSST).

    “Test-retest reliability ranged from poor (ICC < 0.5 for single-leg balance) to good (ICC 0.75-0.9 for 5-STS, 30-STS, gait, and FSST), improving with repeated testing.”

    HumansRemote assessment at homeThree sessions, one week apart68% femalesn = 19

    Remote physical function testing in older adults: a mixed methods study exploring test reliability, feasibility, and perceptions of participants and assessors

    PloS one

Latest